Just about to go and buy an UWA and pretty much sold on the Sigma 10-20 and though it might be interesting to see some stats on the more common lens that I considered for landscape type photography and such.
Sigma 10-20
Canon ef-s 10-22
Canon 16-35
Tokina 12-24
Just about to go and buy an UWA and pretty much sold on the Sigma 10-20 and though it might be interesting to see some stats on the more common lens that I considered for landscape type photography and such.
Last edited by mikew09; 11-07-2011 at 9:19pm.
Please be honest with your Critique of my images. I may not always agree, but I will not be offended - CC assists my learning and is always appreciate
https://mikeathome.smugmug.com/
Canon 5D3 - Gripped, EF 70-200 L IS 2.8 MkII, , 24-105 L 4 IS MkI, 580 EX II Speedlite, 2x 430 Ex II Speedlite
There are very few options in this poll, which makes it something of a miracle that I was able to vote in it. But I was, so I did.
Mike, why would you have the Sigma 10-20 when you could have a Canon 10-22? (I'm not having a go at you, just wondering why.)
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM.
I tend to rarely deviate from the 16mm focal length.
I chose Sigma 10-20 cause from the list, its the one I own but my main WA lens is the Nikon 17-35
"It is one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it is another thing to make a portrait of who they are" - Paul Caponigro
Constructive Critique of my photographs is always appreciated
Nikon, etc!
RICK
My Photography
regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff
I use the Tokina on my 5D2 and I'm really quite happy with it.
I can't rattle of techy stuff but it's nice and sharp and does the trick
Chris
none of the above
but I do use a nikon 17-35
Last edited by Tommo1965; 11-07-2011 at 10:39pm.
Gravy me. Or add the Tamron 11-18mm, not that I wouldn't have had the Canon 10-22mm if I could afford it.
Canon 50D - Zuiko 28/2.8 50/1.8 100/2.8 - Tokina 11-16/2.8
Hi Tannin, mostly cost. Has not be great for pocket money since the GFC so every penny counts. I did consider the canon but pretty expensive in comparison and for all the research I have done seems only marginly better. I will still barter the price as always but doubtful they will drop it enough tomake it a choice.
Are there two Sigma 10-20, one f 3.5 and the other f4-5.6. So which one are we talking about? $680 vs $520
I was talking the f4-5.6, I dont see the reason for f3.5 if your just shooting landscapes and using a tripod , Maybe some Architectural indoor stuff may need the f3.5