reasearch done already. cheers.
reasearch done already. cheers.
LR3 is great for me - echo kiwi's comments from the top of this post.
Check out my new site - www.wattsgallery.com - feedback welcome
Gear - Canon 5D, 40D, 10-22, 24-70 2.8L, 200 2.8L, 50 1.8, 430EXII
I have had a play with LR 3 and used it for 30 days as a trial, and cannot work with it...
i have my own systems and things in place for catalouging...
so my work flow is to cull / check using simple img viewing software, and editing the Raws if need be in CS5
but i have seen a few others use LR3 almost exclusively, so each to their own, try it, see if you like it and work with what your comfortable with
M
www.pbase.com/mcphotographics loooots of pictures!
hmmm Eq list... 1D II, 5D II, 7D, 100-400 LIS F4.5-5.6, 70-200 F2.8L, 135 F2, 85 F1.8, 24-70 F2.8L, 16-35 F2.8L, 420EX, 580EX II x2 ST-E2 Cir polar filters and much much more all in a neat back pack that kills my back!
Adobe CS5
Week 16 Sheep Winner
If you have a question about car / action / sports photography or Canon Cameras PM me...
Whilst I'm not a full time pro, I am heavily involved in photography having shot 20 weddings this year plus a few other events/sessions. . I use LR almost exclusively for my work and I only go to photoshop on very rare occasions where more serious editing is required (ie. montages, background removals, panoramics etc). Also, the full time guys I work with also use LR almost exclusively too but as a number of posters have said, it's quite dependent on your needs and personal preferences.
*Removed : Discussion of illegal activity is not allowed on AP : Admin.*
Don't know about you, but it took me a lot longer than 30 days (that the trial version allows) to notice all the features and learn how to use it. I would never go back to Picasa now!
Last edited by ricktas; 24-12-2010 at 11:35am.