Sorry dude! as I read your answers.... they're wrong answers!
Are we now we're talking video here? Changes in light will really only affect an image at very long exposures and the camera can usually take care of that anyhow if you use the correct mode.
I've never had any issue exposing an image and during that exposure the changes in light have had any affect on the image.
With video, yes.. but with most of my images up to approx 2 seconds any changes in light have never been a problem. And I do primarily shoot landscapes, where light changes all the time.
Firstly you said:
but it will always need PP to fix the changes
Secondly you said:
but I get it right the first time and in camera because I use a light meter
(and going by your current gallery, I find that statement rather hard to believe!)
So which is it?
you want us to believe(and based on what premise/level of experience?) that by using the light meter, the histogram is going to subsequently be more accurate? Is this what your argument is?
I'm sure whatever
you're on... it's the wrong stuff!
I'm just glad I haven't wasted money on trainers to teach me guff like that!
The image I posted for the sake of
your clarification was shot without the use of a lightmeter and, as categorically stated, using only the histogram on the review screen provided by the camera, which was confirmed by the correct software, even tho the incorrect software deemed it to be incorrect... and thus requiring PP(as you said).
Which software would be inclined to trust.
As I said.. you're on the wrong stuff.. but thanks for your comments anyhow, I think your comments have allowed many of us an insight into something that we've only suspected .... until now.
.... is this another
fried chicken in the making ?