Originally Posted by
dbose
Thanks a lot guys for the information. It looks like the shorter lenses (like 60mm macro) is good for flowers and longer (like the 105 mm macro) is good for smaller objects. Given that I can not afford 2 lenses now, do you suggest me investing on the Sigma 105mm 2.8 macro and with that can I cover flowers as well (given 60mm is more suited for bigger objects)?
Also on another note, is the 105 mm macro any good for portraits at all over the normal lenses or do I stick to my normal lenses for that?
Thanks again all of you...
Cheers
DJ