Another "interesting" result I noticed last week (and just remembered to post) was their ratings of the Canon 70-200f2.8 IS II against the older version of the lens. The scoring system they use rates the older version better for all except one parameter, yet in their "user case scores" they give the new one more stars.
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Len.../(camera2)/436
Then they write an article comparing the two:
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/New...nts-and-review
I wonder what Canon thinks of such results? Hard to imagine they would spend all that money improving a lens only for it to go backwards? And just about every other review I've read on the version 2 says it is an improvement over the (allready excellent) version 1.