PDA

View Full Version : Evolution in a camera kit



kiwi
10-06-2011, 1:49pm
Do you think Im nuts - this is in a four 1/2 year cycle :

The reason Id like to help is to shortcut my own experience :-)

D40
18-55
55-200
+ 18-200 - 18-55 - 55-200
+ 300 F/4
-18-200 + tamron 28-75
+ tokina 12-24
+ sigma 50-150 2.8
+ nikon 50 1.8
- tokina 12-24
- 300 f/4
+ D2H - D40
+ nikon 85 1.4
- sigma 50-150
+ sigma 120-300 2.8
+ sigma 180 macro
+ d300
- sigma 180 macro
+ nikon 105 micro
- sigma 120-300
+ nikon 70-200
+ nikon 300 2.8
- tamron 28-75
- nikon 85 1.4
+ D3
-nikon 300 2.8
+ nikon 400 2.8
- d300
+d2hs
-dshs
+d300s
+ nikon 20 2.8
+ nikon 24-70
- nikon 50 1.8
+ nikon 50 1.4

Now, see what trouble I am saving you with advice about what lens to buy - and to buy well once !!

PH005
10-06-2011, 1:57pm
Ah , but as wiseman say. One mans trash is another mans treasure. I think I said it here a while ago that photography is a bit like fishing or golf. You think that the upgrade will land you that Big one or magically give you a perfect swing. But most times it dont. :D

colinbm
10-06-2011, 2:00pm
"Do you think Im nuts - this is in a four 1/2 year cycle"

You will be nuts if the misses go nuts while you are out & trashes the lot :o
Col

kiwi
10-06-2011, 2:06pm
So I think this is my current camera and lens kit, and I havent added anything for over a year now

D3
D300s
20 2.8
50 1.4
105 micro
24-70 2.8
70-200 2.8
400 2.8

farmer_rob
10-06-2011, 2:11pm
Do you find enough difference between the 50mm f1.8 and f1.4. This seemed an unusual trade.

farmer_rob
10-06-2011, 2:12pm
Also, you haven't got a real wideangle.

Xenedis
10-06-2011, 2:16pm
Since 2005 when I moved to a DSLR (I have owned digital cameras since 2002), I've owned three DSLRs and 14 lenses.

Two of those lenses were leftovers from my film SLR -- long gone.

I currently own seven lenses, excluding tele-converters.

I haven't bought a lens since 2008, and I'm doing well to maintain my abstinence. :-)

I have more than what I need, and while it's fun to buy new gear, one gets to a point where gear is not a missing ingredient in one's photography. For me, the challenge is outdoor lighting conditions highly favourable to landscape/seascape/cityscape photography.

My last purchase was a new tripod rig, as my old tripod has severe corrosion. My new tripod is taller and heavier, and much more convenient to use.

kiwi
10-06-2011, 3:00pm
Do you find enough difference between the 50mm f1.8 and f1.4. This seemed an unusual trade.

Yes, better build, 1.4 is nice to have, focus is quicker

kiwi
10-06-2011, 3:02pm
Also, you haven't got a real wideangle.

This is true, I sold the tokina after I used it for 20 frames in a year. The 20mm on d3 is plenty wide enough for when I need it.

Xenedis
10-06-2011, 3:03pm
Yes, better build, 1.4 is nice to have, focus is quicker

It seems that the strategy of the major DSLR/lens manufacturers is to offer a cheap 50/1.8 which lacks the better build, AF, aperture and optical qualities of the f/1.4 offering.

I suppose it's a good way to get a fast prime into people's hands, and then later gouge them again when they decide they want the f/1.4 version (or f/1.2 version in Canon land). ;-)

Jules
10-06-2011, 3:23pm
I think there are a few of us around here who would have quite similar 'evolution' lists Darren. I certainly would if I was game enough to write it all down.

I'm reviewing my gear at the moment and thinking of shedding a couple of lenses that don't see much use. I think I need to spend more time with fewer lenses and do more actual shooting as a result.

Bax
10-06-2011, 3:35pm
Great idea, it's made me wonder what my gear would look like if I were to put it in a similar way. Something for me to do tonight.

Xenedis
10-06-2011, 3:46pm
I'm reviewing my gear at the moment and thinking of shedding a couple of lenses that don't see much use. I think I need to spend more time with fewer lenses and do more actual shooting as a result.

Often, being concerned less with gear and more with the image produces better results.

Sometimes having too much gear can be a hindrance.

It's like cable television: 60 channels and there's still nothing on.

ving
10-06-2011, 3:49pm
you started with a d40 darren?
supprised!

kiwi
10-06-2011, 4:13pm
Yip, in November 2006 I believe. Not that long after it was released.

Wayne
10-06-2011, 5:09pm
Yes, you are nuts!

Way too much mucking about for me to do that trade. The clear message is don't buy 3rd party lenses (I never have and never will).
I have done quite a bit of buy/sell Nikkor lenses to now have all that I need, with the only problem being how to carry it all easily. I just got a Guragear Kiboko bag to manage that as it will swallow the 400/2.8 with hood and D3/700 attached in one side and most all the other glass in the other.

I guess I'm lucky in that I researched many many hours before buying the gear I have bought.
My list looks like this;

+D300
+Nikkor 18-200
-D300
-18-200
+D3
+Nikon 70-300VR
+Nikkor 17-35/2.8
+Nikkor 70-200/2.8 VR1
+TC20EII
+Nikon 50/1.8
+D700
+Nikkor 135DC
-Nikon 50/1.8
+Nikon 50/1.4D
-Nikkor 135DC
+Nikkor 200/2VR
-TC20EII
+TC14EII
+Nikkor 24-70/2.8
+Nikkor 200-400VR
+TC17EII
-Nikkor 200-400VR
+Nikkor 85/1.4D
-Nikkor 200/2VR
+Nikkor 24/1.4G
+Nikkor 400/2.8VR
+TC20EIII
-Nikkor 24/1.4G

I'm pretty happy with my current lens line up and find I never get caught needing something I don't have. Never had but still want a macro, looking now for the Nikkor 200/4. I haven't had much chance to give the 400/2.8 and TC20EIII a run yet, but if I find I want more, then maybe will add 600/4 as well.

Bear Dale
10-06-2011, 5:28pm
You enjoy yourself and I bet you've had a ball buying and using all that gear and upgrading your kit and always improving along the way.

Tannin
10-06-2011, 6:07pm
I have no clue what the purpose of this thread is.

But that's never stopped me before, so why start worrying now?

20D
100-400
+18-55
+10-22
+20D
+60/2.8 macro
+50/1,8
+500/4
+MT-24ex
+24-105/4
+TS-E 24
+400D
+1D III
-20D
-18-55
+40D
+18-55 IS
-400D
+40D
+580EX II
+50D
+Tokina 10-17 fish
-40D
+580EX II
+7D
+Tokina 35mm macro
-18-55 IS
+100 IS macro

There are some sort of temporary minuses in there for lenses too - Belinda has my good 40D, plus whatever lens(es) we negotiate at the time. Right now, she has the 60 macro and the 24-105, so I don't have a normal zoom and am making do with the crappy plastic 50/1.8 and the Tokina 35 macro. If I need longer than 35mm, I use the 100-400 on the 1D III, which is about equal to 80mm on a normal camera if you zoom all the way out.

kiwi
10-06-2011, 6:15pm
Not sure there's a point other than showing how one might start small start cheap but usually end up with on brand gear :-)

fabian628
10-06-2011, 8:30pm
too much gear in this thread :o

this happened in a frighteningly short period of time. The biggest mistake I made was buying my first few bodies new.
+1000D
+18-55mm Is
+75-300
+60mm macro
+10-22mm
+18-200mm
+24-70 2.8 sigma
-24-70 2.8 sigma
-75-300
+50D
+100-400
-60mm macro
+mpe65mm
-18-55mm IS
-1000D
-18-200
+7D
+50mm 1.8
-50D
+35L
-50mm 1.8
+1Dmk 3
+ 17-40mm
-100-400
+ 300 2.8
-10-22mm
-7D
+135L
+5Dmk 2
+15mm fisheye
+400 2.8

kiwi
11-06-2011, 7:51am
Y, looking back I'd never buy most things new

I @ M
11-06-2011, 7:55am
I did a mental list and couldn't find any items to put a - sign in front of. :eek:

jim
11-06-2011, 10:24am
I hope someone can see some point in this, 'cos it's taken me ages to work it out:

39 Years Evolution :

+Instamatic 55x
+Olympus XA
+Hanimex something
-Olympus XA
+Pentax SFX
+Takumar 28-80
-Hanimex something
+Cosina 70-210
+Tamron 24 f2.5
+Nikon F801s
+Micro Nikkor 105 f2.8 AF
-Pentax SFX
-Takumar 28-80
-Cosina 70-210
+Nikkor 50 f1.8
+Nikkor 28 f2.8 Ais
+Tamron 70-300
+Nikkor 300 f4.5
-Tamron 70-300
+Nikkor 300 f4 AF
-Nikkor 300 f4.5
-Nikon F801s (stolen)
-Nikkor 28 f2.8 Ais (stolen)
+Nikon F801s
+Nikkor 28 F2 Ai
+Olympus XA
+Nikon D80
+Nikkor 18-35 f3.5-4.5
+Tokina 12-24 f4
+Nikon D300
+Nikon F4
+Nikkor 24 f2.8 AFD


Pretty sure it proves nothing much except that I have no particular prejudice against third party lenses.

Xenedis
11-06-2011, 10:32am
The clear message is don't buy 3rd party lenses (I never have and never will).

I'm in the same boat.


I did a mental list and couldn't find any items to put a - sign in front of. :eek:

Money.

arthurking83
11-06-2011, 11:21am
I did a mental list and couldn't find any items to put a - sign in front of. :eek:

My bad back is proof that I suffer from the same(or similar) affliction!

Although my mentalist-ness is more complete than Andrew's in that I traded my Nikon 80-200/2.8 for the Tamron 70-200/2.8(with a greater smile producing factor to boot!)

I @ M
11-06-2011, 11:50am
Money.

Yep, so very true but I think that with this hobby of photography, a permanent drain on the piggy bank is a forgone conclusion.:(

andylo
17-06-2011, 10:51am
Canon 500D
18-55 IS
Tamron 55-200
Canon 50mm f/1.8
Canon 10-22
Canon 17-85 IS
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX
Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L
Sigma 120-400 OS
Canon 100mm f/2.8 IS L Macro
Canon 17-40 f/4 L
Canon 1D MkIII
Canon 135mm f/2.8 Softfocus
Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L II
Sony NEX5
E mount 18-55mm
E mount 16mm f/2.8

hmm... apart from the 50mm f/1.8 I hated and the 18-55 IS, I still have the rest in my house.

That's not includes other stuff like flashes, light modifier, tripods, accessories etc etc....