ameerat42
12-01-2020, 7:32am
^ The original title used.
https://naturephotographers.network/the-art-of-image-critique/
I saw [the link above] elsewhere and thought the article was worth a read.
It's pretty straightforward and covers the main points, and this:
"For those posting an image, it’s helpful to state what your intended goal or purpose was for taking the image..."
Of the article, I don't agree much about the use of PMs for critique. And the
writer calls this "Offline Communication" :confused013
But the article says nothing direct about the [OP] acknowledging the [CC]
given, even though the writer says a lot about [CC] being a two-way thing.
https://naturephotographers.network/the-art-of-image-critique/
I saw [the link above] elsewhere and thought the article was worth a read.
It's pretty straightforward and covers the main points, and this:
"For those posting an image, it’s helpful to state what your intended goal or purpose was for taking the image..."
Of the article, I don't agree much about the use of PMs for critique. And the
writer calls this "Offline Communication" :confused013
But the article says nothing direct about the [OP] acknowledging the [CC]
given, even though the writer says a lot about [CC] being a two-way thing.