Reasons why your photos don't need to be 100 % sharp and in focus!

[Claire M]

I found this little article an interesting read and would like to share it with you, particularly coming from a creative perspective! (as quite a lot of my photos are). :D

https://digital-photography-school.com/blur-and-creative-photography-images-dont-need-100-sharp/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Nov-0118 (https://digital-photography-school.com/blur-and-creative-photography-images-dont-need-100-sharp/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Nov-0118)

[ameerat42]

Less "reasons" than point-of-view/opinion/challenging straw-men ideas.

The old art-vs-reality argument (not quite a debate).

She's not "wrong", but neither are her "opponents".

[MarkChap]

The title is completely misleading for that article
Your images 100% must be sharp or rather, the important part of your image must be 100% sharp
The article is about the fundamental skill of Depth of Field, whether that is very shallow or very deep is a creative choice made by the photographer