User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  3
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Which lens??

  1. #21
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    11 Apr 2011
    Location
    Roleystone
    Posts
    88
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lance B View Post
    . However, for me it is a specialist lens and I only use it in some situations,
    In what situations would you use the 14-24?
    Sue-ann

    Nikon D700/D90 | Nikkor 14-24/2.5 | Nikkor 50/1.8 | Nikkor 24-70/2.8 | Nikkor 105/2.8 | Nikon Speedlight SB-600 | Think Tank Streetwalker
    My Flickr Site


  2. #22
    Moderately Underexposed
    Join Date
    04 May 2007
    Location
    Marlo, Far East Gippsland
    Posts
    4,902
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The 14-24 ( along with other wide to ultra wide lenses ) are very versatile.
    Use them where you want a truly massive field of view from a single image such as landscapes, capturing large numbers of people in a smallish room, building interiors and exteriors or where you want to use the naturally occurring distortion to put an artistic slant on ordinary subjects.

    In FX terms, 12 or 14 mm is really in the ultrawide territory and the 24 mm end is at the wider end of the wide scale so it really depends on how much field of view you want / need.
    Andrew
    Nikon, Fuji, Nikkor, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina and too many other bits and pieces to list.



  3. #23
    Who let the rabble in?
    Join Date
    04 Aug 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    8,405
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by I @ M View Post
    The 14-24 ( along with other wide to ultra wide lenses ) are very versatile.
    Use them where you want a truly massive field of view from a single image such as landscapes, capturing large numbers of people in a smallish room, building interiors and exteriors or where you want to use the naturally occurring distortion to put an artistic slant on ordinary subjects.

    In FX terms, 12 or 14 mm is really in the ultrawide territory and the 24 mm end is at the wider end of the wide scale so it really depends on how much field of view you want / need.
    Another good write up. The other thing with these ultra wide angles is to give a sense of making the nearby subject matter appear big and dominating whilst the background fades into the distance and/or using leading lines to draw you into the photo. Not that these are 14mm, but 16mm, as I have only just purchased the 14-24 and haven't many good examples yet but still trying!

    This is sort of the thing I mean, where the pool was the focus of attention and the building in the background is there just to show in what context the pool is there.



    In this photo, I purposely included the bridge gardens as a frame and and the hook as a leading pointer to the Thun River in Thun, Switzerland. Whether it actually works for you is another thing! But I like it.



    In this shot, I wanted the little fountains to have more impact than they ordinarily would have if I'd used a normal lens, so I used 16mm and got a little closer and still kept Sommerset House, off The Strand in London, big in the phot for context.



    Here is a shot taken where VR played an important part, IS3200, 1/10sec, f13. I used f13 to get as much DOF as possible of the floor to lead you into the photo. Using f13, this required ISO3200 and 1/10sec.



    Here is a crop of the corner to show that it has good corner sharpness due.

    Last edited by Lance B; 13-06-2011 at 5:23pm.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •