User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  9
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: An upgrade to 7D question

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    24 Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tannin, thank you, I appreciate the advice.

    My fear was when I did start producing better photo's I would regret not spending the money when I had the chance The things you have mentioned (in the difference) will, I am sure, matter to me in a few years time, but for now I will stick to my 50D and continue to try and remember to do more than point and pray
    "Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!"
    — Hunter S. Thompson

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    30 May 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,594
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BecM View Post
    Tannin, thank you, I appreciate the advice.

    My fear was when I did start producing better photo's I would regret not spending the money when I had the chance The things you have mentioned (in the difference) will, I am sure, matter to me in a few years time, but for now I will stick to my 50D and continue to try and remember to do more than point and pray
    Tending to agree with Tannin on this.

    Doubtlessly, the 7d is a better camera but, I guess you want to know is it so much better that you should spend hundreds on a change-over.

    Firstly, could you look at 2 photos and tell which was taken by a 50d and a 7d: I very much doubt it... Or at least, there are at least a dozen other important factors to consider before I would consider this.

    The benefits (as I see them) of a 7d over the 50d:
    A few more megapixels... not a huge deal
    A few more shots per second... maybe a big deal for sports but hardly for landscapes
    Less noise... better high ISO performance (do you normally do a lot where you need high ISO?)...
    Better built, weather sealing is better. (are you likely to use it in drizzle / are you a little rough on your equip)
    and I think the AF system is a little better.

    If I had the 50d, I really don't think I could justify the expense (unless it is the 'new toy' feeling needing to be satisfied)

    I honestly think you'd be better off getting yourself I good landscape eg. the sigma 10-20 (around $700) (for eg) or even a good all-rounder like the 24-105 L (about $1700). If you don't have a flash, get a 580EX-II ($500-600) (or a generic equiv) or even a super-steady tripod ($300-500).

    I really think you'll notice improvement from these things more than a slight body upgrade.

    Scotty
    Canon 7D : Canon EF 70-200mm f:2.8 L IS II USM - Canon EF 24-105 f:4 L IS USM - Canon EF 50mm f:1.8 - Canon EF-s 18-55mm f:3.5-5.6
    Sigma APO 150-500mm f:5-6.3 DG OS HSM
    - Sigma 10-20mm f:3.5 EX DC HSM
    Speedlite 580 EX II - Nissin Di866 II - Yongnuo 460-II x2 - Kenko extension tube set - Canon Extender EF 1.4x II
    Manfroto monopod - SILK 700DX Pro tripod - Remote release - Cokin Z-Pro filter box + Various filters

    Current Social Experiment: CAPRIL - Wearing a cape for the month of April to support Beyond Blue
    Visit me on Flickr

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •