Waz
Be who you are and say what you mean, because those who matter don't mind don't matter and those who mind don't matter - Dr. Seuss...
D700 x 2 | Nikkor AF 50 f/1.8D | Nikkor AF 85 f/1.8D | Optex OPM2930 tripod/monopod | Enthusiasm ...
When is this thread going to end.
We have been here not that long ago.
Geoff
Honesty is best policy.
CC is always welcome
Nikon D3000 ... Nikon D90... Nikon D700 Various lenses, Home studio equipment and all the associated stuff
Flickr
--=3 In Veritas Lux E=--
Bodies: Canon EOS 5D Mk II, Canon EOS 550D
Lenses: EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
Strobist: 2 x Speedlite 580EXII, 4 x Yongnuo RF-603 Radio Tranceivers, Yongnuo ST-E2 IR Transmitter
3 x Manfrotto Light Stands, 2 x Softboxes, 2 x Bounce Brollies
Tripod: Vanguard Alta Pro 263AT, PH-50 Panhead
That's it Col.. Your next CC will be an absolute shocker....... (just joking)
Seen the same arguements on the thread that related to that photographer who took photos of children and claimed it as art. It ended fairly heated. I feel this thread will end the same.
I read this thread cause I enjoy some of the comments, and what people feel on the subject. It's all healthy until someone gets hurt.
Again you fail to answer my question.
I have specifically discounted the specific Henson case and asked what specific law should there be to prevent exploitation.
BTW Currently we have CP in two categories (<18 and aggravated 14) and a SA pollie being busted for CP on both counts. http://www.news.com.au/national/mp-a...-1226042484463
Yet there are those that argue that this should not even be a crime as in their view it is either art or a 'natural' expression.
When does it stop being art and come under 'exploitive' porn? Again, Where would you draw the line? be specific!
Last edited by ElectricImages; 21-04-2011 at 10:46am.
Last edited by WhoDo; 21-04-2011 at 4:20pm. Reason: type-O