just a quick little post to see what fellow members use/preferred has anyone gone from 5dmk2 to 1dsmk3 or the other way? pros & cons between both ?
5dmk2
1dsmk3
just a quick little post to see what fellow members use/preferred has anyone gone from 5dmk2 to 1dsmk3 or the other way? pros & cons between both ?
|Gear|Canon 5D MkII + Grip |Canon 7D + Grip |Canon 580EXII x 3|Canon EF Fisheye 15mm F/2.8 |Canon EF 16-35mm F/2.8L Mk II | |Canon EF 400mm F/5.6L |Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS |Canon EF 24-105mm F/4 L IS |Canon EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro |Canon EF 50mm F/1.8 MK II |Sekonic L-358 Lightmeter |Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod + 322RC2 Head |Manfrotto 628B Monopod | Wireless Remote Flash Trigger PT-04 CN & 5 Receivers| Plus Too Much More (Filters Ect)
Chris | http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=119829358036800 | http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisprendergast |
one is more a sports nature birding type camera the other is a landscape portrait type camera........from what ive seen anyway.......so it all boils down to what you shoot both are good cameras
my 2 cents
Ben
Camera: 7d
Lenses: Canon 17 - 55 f2.8, Canon 85mm f1.8, Sigma 30mm f1.4
Flash: 430 exii
they are both full frame around the same mp different image sensors about the same frame rate i believe, the 1d mark 3 is more the sporting/wildlife camera ?
seeing as you use grips on your body's i suggest holding/ using a series one if you can as they feel nice in the hand ? not as chunky with a grip attached to a normal body. regards
5D2 has:
- Video
- Better LCD/image preview
- More pink colour tones
- DIGIC IV
- Maybe 1/3 stops better at ISO 800+
- Smaller form factor
1Ds3 has:
- (Much) Cleaner files at low ISO
- More Yellow colour tones
- Dual CF redundancy
- More AF options
- Better Build
- More expensive (more than double the price)
Impossible Choice for me personally, if not for the LCD/image review issue I would go for the 1Ds3, but given that issue, I am uncertain. Only clear decision is that the 1Ds4 will be better than both
You might be thinking of the Canon EOS-1D Mark IV, which has a 1.3x FOVCF and can shoot at 10.5fps.
This camera is beneficial to sports and wildlife shooters because of the frame rate, increased AF points (and better AF in general), and crop factor; ie, it's not necessary to discard pixels in cropping to achieve tighter framing.
The 1Ds Mark III still has a higher pixel density though, so there's more pixels per player even after cropping
thanks all for the comments
i thought the 1d had more fps?
Don't think I could be bothered with any of the built in grip cameras.
IMHO, the '1' range is the best of the Canon cameras. My 1DsMkII was a terrific camera. I would choose it over the 5D any model.
Odille
“Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky”
My Blog | Canon 1DsMkII | 60D | Tokina 20-35mm f/2.8 AF AT-X PRO | EF50mm f/1.8| Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM | Fujifilm X-T1 & X-M1 | Fujinon XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS | Fujinon XC 50-230mm F3.5-5.6 OIS | Fujinon XF 18-55mm F2.8-4R LM OIS | tripods, flashes, filters etc ||
was trying to decide between these two. The price difference is quite large + I want a camera with video. Ideally id like the 1d4 and 1ds3
I would take 1ds3 if you only have one camera. but with 1d3 I choose the 5d2.
1DIII, 5DII, 15mm fish, 24mm ts-e, 35L,135L,200L,400L,mpe-65mm
Film: eos 300, pentax 6x7
1dsiii is my pick
I think the '1' series also has better weather sealing, based on reviews.
thanks all for all the input
Love my 5D MKII. Have the 7D as well, but it seems to stay home most of the time.
Rather spend my money on new glass than the 1D - well that is my opinion.
Sometimes I feel like a thief - capturing and holding life for that instant.