Thanks everyone for your input , some very interesting points and arguments for and against both formats , have to admit I am leaning towards the 300 but that can change .
Thanks everone
wait and see what happens with the d90 upgrade, should be happening sept. 18th
NIGH -KON
well, hopefully announced, but who knows when avail, and when affordable?
Mmmm , I'm almost sold on the D700 but my lens choice has changed as I have been reading a lot of great stuff about the 24-70 2.8 .
A touch confused as I would have thought that the 700 would be a natural progression from DX format , but some advice seems to be 300s is as good .
I have to admit to really starting to notice the limits with the D80 and ISO settings ,even at 400 you can see noise in RAW shots
Last edited by Goatch; 16-09-2010 at 2:24pm.
D7000 Goatch man might be the one for you.....and me as well.... I`ve been reading as much as I can find on the net. It is saying that at iso 3200 it`s really good and that would do me. I`m not going for video but will probably use/play with it. It`s cheaper than the 300s and in most ways betters it. Smaller and lighter as well. Can`t wait to see some honest sample pics at higher iso values. I also have debated whether to go to the 700 but then there is the lens issue. I have three lenses that I`d be able to use FF so that`s a start. Decisions, decisions........
Hey Old Dog
The lens issue your talking about is the DX Lens on an FX format body ? , everything I've read said the D700 adjusts accordingly when it recognises a DX hanging off the front or is this wrong . I was hoping to be able to use my 10-24 DX on the 700
If you are not going full-frame, then the new D7000 would be hard to beat.
My PBase site: http://www.pbase.com/lance_b
My Flickr site: https://www.flickr.com/photos/35949907@N02/