ok just wondering on these which prefer and why?
no PP
PP
no pp
PP
gravy
ok just wondering on these which prefer and why?
no PP
PP
Cat (aka Cathy) - Another Canon user - 400D, 18-55,75-300mm Kit Lens,50mm f1.8, Tamron 90mm f2.8 Macro, Sigma 28-70 f2.8-4 DG, Tripod and a willingness to learn
Software used: PhotoImpact, Irfanview and a lot of plugins
We don't make a photograph just with a camera, we bring to the act of photography all the books we have read, the movies we have seen, the music we have heard, the people we have loved. - Ansel Adams
For me the green looks greener in the first. And maybe the PPed one is possibly a little over sharpened?? both look good though
Critique and comments welcomed on my images!
www.philrettkephotography.com
http://www.flickr.com/philrettke
Canon EOS 5D MKII x 2 | Ef 70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM | Ef 16-35mm f2.8L II | Ef 180mm f/3.5L macro | Ef 24-70mm f/2.8L | Adobe Photoshop CS3 extended | Digital Photo Professional | Photomatix Pro 3 | Adobe Lightroom 2.3
No PP, or at least not this PP. Too much sharpening that makes the grass hurt your eyes.
Ciao, Joost
All feedback is highly appreciated!
Thanks Phil & Jev
Yah, too much dat sharpening ting.
First picture don't need much, maybe yust a tiny tweak in curves?
Thanks Jim and David
I gather the tammy's real sharp if didnt need to sharpen after Using 90mm on these
Its funny cause i usually have to sharpen a heap - these today didnt
i actually prefer the second one - cant say why - maybe the colouring of the duck looks better
Thanks Mongo and milsey
Milsey its a cygnet (baby swan) not a duck
First one because it dosent need much and the PP one is overcooked, like most others said. . Good to see you giving the Tammy a workout...good quality lens for the price eh
Last edited by David; 22-08-2009 at 10:52pm.
Comments and CC welcome..
Gear: Canon 6D & 1Ds Cameras l Canon EF 17-40mm F 4.0 L USM l Canon EF 24-105mm F4.0 L IS USM l Canon EF 70 - 200 F4.0 L USM Lenses I Manfrotto Tripods I Adobe Photoshop CS6 l Lightroom 3.0 I Lee Filters
"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes." Marcel Proust 1871 - 1922
Yes #1 for me too, a baby swan would feel soft, the sharpening makes me feel its a bit harsh. Maybe somewhere inbetween would be the go.
Thanks David and Mic
David, yeah tammy is nice and sharp so far hasnt been off camera lol
Yeah i wass a little worried the babes lost their fluff with the sharpen
I say no PP with this shot.
I think the original is sharp enough to begin with.... PLUS the cygnet (nearly said duck! haha) looks all soft and fluffy. Looks a bit spikier or something when it's sharpened.
**Canon EOS 40D *** **Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM**Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L***Canon 580EX Speedlight**
I'm here to learn, honest critique welcome on my photos unless otherwise stated.
>>>>www.melissamillerphotography.com.au <<<<
Thanks Gypsy - yeah I should really have gone with my initial thoughts and not sharpened really on these babies..
the feathers look fluffier in the pp`d one Cat.
Thanks Graeme I think that may be cause the pp has brought out more shades in them?
Yep, the unsharp masking is a bit too high.
Jim Canon 40D – Canon 70-200mm f/4L – Nifty 50 f/1.8 – Tokina 12-24 f/4 - Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro Critique welcome
http://home.exetel.com.au/shim/index.htm
Actually it's interesting cause I usually sharpen way more than i did on that one - i only did a lightish sharpen - i gather its the soft feathers plus the tammy sharp... Never done a pic of the babies before using the tammy till now
The textures, grass and down in the first look spot on. I think sometimes there's a tendency to oversharpen....just because we can. I know I've done it.