I'm thinking of entering this in a club "Portrait" comp. Do you think it's a legitimate portrait entry?
small_models3c.jpg
I'm thinking of entering this in a club "Portrait" comp. Do you think it's a legitimate portrait entry?
small_models3c.jpg
They look like maniquies.
If I were (that I am not) a judge then I would not accept it as a portrait photo.
Regards.
J. Arguello.
Constructive Criticism (CC) is alsways welcome.
Photography gear: Nikon D7000; Tokina 11-20mm f/2.8; Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5 - 5.6; Tamron A17 70-300mm f/4 - 5.6; Nikkor 50mm f/1.8; Yongnuo 35mm f/2; Neewer 85mm f/1.8; Nikon AW100 ;Canon EOS 300; Tamron 28-105mm; Canon 75-300mm.
Photo Editing: Nikon Capture NX-D , GIMP ;
Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/arguelloflores/
A bit of a -ky stretch of the field, Bob. That's just MO, though.
Aside: can they change a light bulb? How many mannequins does it take...
CC, Image editing OK.
No, I would as a Judge at a APS/SAPF comp DQ it
regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff
Hmmmm ... interesting. How about if the portrait were of an animal?
I'd say so, as a portrait is... well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portrait
But it depends on how strict they are
Ahhh .... that's a key issue with Judges. We had a judge for a set subject on Ships. He ignored all images which were part of a ship or a single ship. Personally I'd have thrown him overboard.
Then we had a debate about a topic called "Postcode 3000". The argument was over a boat traveling down the Yarra River - the postal area border is the middle of the river!!! Aaaaargh!!!
Zounds! like a rod of your own making, Bob Such hair-splitters!!
and I was about to ask you to get four phone numbers for me Bob. The ones at each end of the 2nd row, the ......
Maybe you could still chase up the number for the one at the far back left. I'd like to ask how her left shoulder is going after the operation.
Now animals are valid subjects for portraits. (whether the judge agrees is irrelevant)
Last edited by Mark L; 13-04-2016 at 8:16pm.
Just as well it's the local camera club then ...... here's my "Portrait"
smaller_Image004.jpg
- - - Updated - - -
That is very specific! Couldn't get a much narrower interpretation than that. Thanks.
I was going to say, don't pay that photographer. He's shot too close and only got your guide dog in the picture.
That is an interesting question when you first look at the photo. Now I have spent 30 secs to take it in I would say no. The subject isn't living which in my mind is the basis of a portrait. To capture someone living at the time in space and for the purpose of preserving the memory of that person along with a frame that can tell a story, and emotion, character, profession etc.
To me with the frame containing the subjects as it has - I would lean a little more to abstract I think.
Please be honest with your Critique of my images. I may not always agree, but I will not be offended - CC assists my learning and is always appreciate
https://mikeathome.smugmug.com/
Canon 5D3 - Gripped, EF 70-200 L IS 2.8 MkII, , 24-105 L 4 IS MkI, 580 EX II Speedlite, 2x 430 Ex II Speedlite
Still Life was your last such topic