The key is to rank/categorise/rate your images on initial preview.
This can be done in such a varied manner and for many differing reasons. For example, a while back on a shoot out at Lake Eyre, the flies were so thick in the air, I had to mark so many otherwise good exposures as bad(ie. un rated) simply because of the flies on the lens, or hovering around the front of the lens.
I had to bribe them to stay put in a specific area with a slice of ham(which some of them loved) .. just to get them out of the way of the lens!
So rating is a highly recommended strategy to perform on initial loading of images to the PC.
if you do this try to work on a plan for rating based on a possible long term strategy.
Once an image is rated or ranked, you can then filter the images into a type of category.
Filter the images to view the good ones, or alternatively view only the bad, unranked images and then delete .. or keep or whatever.
I'm constantly going back to images I may have shot years ago due to a tweaking of the memory cells upon seeing something in an image I recently captured or whatever other reason.
Eg. on the last weekend I shot about 50 images .. and really have only looked at them briefly on initial downloading to the PC.
Had a quick attempt at general editing on initial view, but my real priority was to rate them.
I altered WB on a couple for now, but I'll probably still have to leave this set for a few more days yet.
And the reality is that I only played with this one particular image in the set because I have been trialling some more software .... comparing my current editing programs with the trial one I'd downloaded.