Quote Originally Posted by William W View Post
Selling any image to a newspaper is more difficult than: Real Estate; Stock Photography or Sports Coverage.

WW
Agree. However real estate photography (generally) seems to be the cut throat world of 'cheaper is just as good', with RE agencies just trying to get shots at the cheapest possible price, in the majority of markets (suburban/rural areas). I do not believe an RE agent is going to be loyal to a photographer long term, rather it is all about commissions and profits, and maximising those at any expense. It may be good to make a few extra bucks to cover the cost of a bit of new gear, but I would not want to have RE photography as sole source of income.