^ The original title used.

https://naturephotographers.network/...mage-critique/

I saw [the link above] elsewhere and thought the article was worth a read.
It's pretty straightforward and covers the main points, and this:

"For those posting an image, it’s helpful to state what your intended goal or purpose was for taking the image..."


Of the article, I don't agree much about the use of PMs for critique. And the
writer calls this "Offline Communication"


But the article says nothing direct about the [OP] acknowledging the [CC]
given, even though the writer says a lot about [CC] being a two-way thing.