Much of a muchness as they say.
I think D7000 is slightly better at this level, but I also admit that the video function is something I'd use regularly too!
But I want better video.
Anyhow.. don't discount the gear due to some feature you won't ever use ... you are not obliged to use it, and every current DSLR except the D700(and the odd oddball obscure camera too) has video now, so whether you like it or not you're going to get video anyhow.
I agree about the Sony SLT type cameras. They seem to have a lot going for them, but be aware of the caveats with the high performance figures Sony is quoting.
A77 should last a while as a camera with interesting specs, that is before an updated version with some new ultra uber spec that is a must have.
I got to tell you, that I'd have been happy with a Nikon D700(no video) if not for the simple fact that I want video. Otherwise I'd have got one about a year ago.
it depends on your shooting needs. But if I were in your situation(and video is definitely a feature not wanted) I'd go with a D700. Expensive for sure by comparison, but ultimately a better option if growth into the hobby is something you expect to do.
As other have said and will continue to say for ever and a day ... the lenses you choose will have a greater bearing in your photography life.