Anyone know what the diff is btwn these types?
For nikon will VR still work after a Kenko TC?
Anyone know what the diff is btwn these types?
For nikon will VR still work after a Kenko TC?
I have the kenko Pro 300 TC 1.5 on my Nikkor 300 mm f/4. AF-s and it works a treat communicate with camera perfectly,as for
the other i have no experience
cheers
Nikon D750,D500,Z6,Coolpix P7700
Nikkor 300mm f/4E PF ED VR, Nikkor 16-35mm f/4 VR, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, Tokina 100mm f/2.8, Tamron 60mm f/2 , Tamron SP 24-70mm f2.8 VC Di, Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4
FTZ adapator
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art
I never heard of the MC7, but I'm sure that the Pro300's do(still operate the VR correctly) ... I think??
I know that they have been updated to record the correct exif info from lens to camera, and that AF works, on all AF types (AF-D and AF-S/AF-I).
I found it in
http://kenkoglobal.com/TP-MC7AF2X-DGX.html
see the 3 types, with little info other than 'TC makes lenses longer!!'
They don't sell the 1.5x, there's now a 1.4 or 2.0 and 3.0. Can't seem to find any really scientific reviews, and other reviews don't mention VR.
Since VR is tuned to the lens, stuffing the focal length should affect the effectiveness of the VR movements?
I believe the MC7 is the old version and the 300 is their latest version.
All my photos are taken with recycled pixels.
Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom, is knowing not to serve it in a fruit salad.
so I stuck the TC in front of my lens
I haven't actually shot anything yet, but it makes the VR very noisy
double of no TC, and on all the time
I have had the 1.4TC on my 70-300vr and everything functioned as per normal. Good daylight.
yeh, waiting for a day I have time to go out in the daytime to try it out