User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  2
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Help with Nikon Wide Angle Lens Which One to buy

  1. #1
    Member Slipperyfox's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Sep 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Help with Nikon Wide Angle Lens Which One to buy

    I am wanting to buy the wife a wide angle lens for her Nikon D5000 for Xmas.
    Have been doing a bit of reading and all points to the Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 10-24mm f3.5-4.5G ED lens. I am not right into, so don't really understand spec and jargon but she wants to get into photography a bit more seriously. I was looking at other lens as well and saw the Nikon Mount Sigma 8-16mm F4.5-5.6 DC HSM lens and reading on Ken Rockwell site he said this was alright as well.
    What i was wondering what way should I go if anyone can help please.
    Current lenses AF-s 35mm 1:1.8G, 18-55 1:3.5-5.6G, 55-200mm 1.4-5.6G ED, 70-300mm 1:4.5-5.6G ED and SB800

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Administrator ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Buy the Sigma 10-20, it is a great lens at budget price!
    "It is one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it is another thing to make a portrait of who they are" - Paul Caponigro

    Constructive Critique of my photographs is always appreciated
    Nikon, etc!

    RICK
    My Photography

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    11 Oct 2010
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    384
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the Nikkor 10-24 and the Tokina 11-16, I think the Nikkor is the best option. The only advantage to thr Tokina is the 2.8 aperture, it comes in handy for astrophotography. The Nikkor has better flare control, less CA, sharpness is about the same, and the wider zoom range is a big advantage. The Tok has no focus motot so it wont AF on your wife's D5000.

    Everything I've read points to these 2 lenses as the best options.

    The sigma 8-16 get good reviews but it does not accept filters, that was a dealbraker for me as I use ND grads on all my shots.

    The 10-24 is the best choice but it comes at a premium price. The other options are by no means bad, just slightly behind the Nikkor.

  4. #4
    Account Closed Wayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Dec 2009
    Location
    Eastside
    Posts
    1,633
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just be aware that with a D5000, in order for a lens to auto focus it must have a focus motor built into the lens as the body doesn't have a screw motor. For Nikon lenses, the name of the lens will start with "AF-S" for Sigma I believe it is "HSM".

    Remember also that the D5000 is a crop sensor or "DX" body, so whatever the focal length is, multiply that x1.5 for the 35mm equivalent, so things like the superb 17-55mm f/2.8 will be approx 25mm-82mm.
    The ultra wides like the one Rick has suggested will give that wide perspective you are probably looking for.

  5. #5
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    8,777
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ricktas View Post
    Buy the Sigma 10-20, it is a great lens at budget price!
    +1

    can be had for much less, and she'll be as happy as ... ummm ... a wife showered with wonderful gifts at Christmas time

    Sigma 8-16 is also an apparently great lens for the type of lens it is, but is a bit more limited in what it can ultimately do.

    Get the Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 (not the more expensive f/3.5 version) and a 77mm circular polariser to boot.
    Nikon D800E, D300, D70s
    {Nikon}; -> 50/1.2 : 500/8 : 105/2.8VR Micro : 180/2.8 ais : 105mm f/1.8 ais : 24mm/2 ais
    {Sigma}; ->10-20/4-5.6 : 50/1.4 : 12-24/4.5-5.6II : 150-600mm|S
    {Tamron}; -> 17-50/2.8 : 28-75/2.8 : 70-200/2.8 : 300/2.8 SP MF : 24-70/2.8VC

    {Yongnuo}; -> YN35/2N : YN50/1.8N


  6. #6
    I am older than I look.
    Join Date
    31 Oct 2009
    Location
    Tura Beach, NSW
    Posts
    3,654
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 and it is a stunning lens for an ultra-wide zoom.

    I know quite a few people with the Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 and some with the f/3.5, again, both good choices but the larger filter size can be an issue in the f/3.5. The other lens is outstanding value for money.

    The Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 is also a great lens but the zoom range is a little limited. On the other hand, you will get the brightest viewfinder and that will help with AF and framing as light falls.

    If you intend to do shots with sky in, you will probably want to invest in some graduated neutral density filters (GND) so it is essential to avoid any ultra wides that don't take filters on the front of the lens.
    Cheers

    PeterB666


    Olympus Pen F with Metabones Speed Booster and Laowa 12mm f/2.8 or Voigtlander 10.5mm f/0.95 or Nikon D800 with the Laowa 12mm f/2.8. The need to keep in touch with the past is a Nikon Photomic FTn or Nikon F2A and a Nikkor 25-50mm f/4 AI

  7. #7
    D750 Shines
    Join Date
    10 Oct 2009
    Location
    Wollongong
    Posts
    801
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I love my Tokina 11-16 its built like a brick sh#thouse .I am guilty of just now using it enough

    cheers
    Last edited by cupic; 15-12-2011 at 11:50pm.




    Nikon D750,D500,Z6,Coolpix P7700
    Nikkor 300mm f/4E PF ED VR, Nikkor 16-35mm f/4 VR, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8, Tokina 100mm f/2.8, Tamron 60mm f/2 , Tamron SP 24-70mm f2.8 VC Di, Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4
    FTZ adapator
    Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art

  8. #8
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    8,777
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cupic View Post
    I love my Tokina 11-16 its built like a brick sh#thouse .I am guilty of just now using it enough

    cheers
    Yep! great lens for sure, and if I had a need for another UWA lens, I'd have one too.

    But for a D5000, or any non screw driven AF camera body, this lens is not ideal.
    Sometimes AF is the difference between getting a good shot compared to a great shot!

  9. #9
    Member Zonda's Avatar
    Join Date
    09 Jan 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the Tokina 12-24 f4 which is great value and I've found gives great results. It will focus with the d5000. Whilst it isn't as fast as the 11-16 I tend to use it during the day so ths speed isn't as much of an issue for me and the greater zoom range means I'm not constantly changing lenses.

  10. #10
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Slipperyfox's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Sep 2011
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks heaps everyone. And have ordered a 11-16 pickup on Wednesday just in time for Xmas... Merry Christmas to everyone

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    04 Dec 2011
    Location
    Wollongong
    Posts
    151
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good luck with the Tokina 11-16mm. I was looking to buy that lens but the lack of autofocus on my D40 held me back. I ended up buying the sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 instead. I was doing some shooting last night with this lens. Some pixel peeping certainly reveals some softness around the edges/corners, even at f/10. Not enough to worry me too much though.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    14 Jun 2010
    Location
    Brunswick
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good read as I was also on the serch for an UWA lens. Any inputs with regards to vignetting? I once had the 111-16mm Tokina lens. It was great and tack sharp, however, I found the range to be limiting. And using a CPL filter, it vignettes at 11mm to 13mm if I remember it correctly.

    What about the Sigma 10-20 and Nikkor 10-24 with regards to vignetting?
    Nikon User
    Nikon D300
    Walk-around lens:Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 AF-S G VR1; Nikkor 24-70 f/2.8 AF-S G
    Macro (the lazy type): Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 (kitlens); reverse ring adaptor
    Strobing: SB900; Flashwave trigger III, generic gorilla pod

    FLICKR http://www.flickr.com/photos/joeyvaldezjr/

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    19 Oct 2011
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm new to photography and still trying to get my head around what will and what will not auto focus, there are lots of numbers on lens l don't understand I have a Nikon D5100 with a 18 105 lens. I would like to get more into landscape photos and hence my interest in wide angle lens. Sigma 10-20, Nikkor 10-24, Tokina 12-24 ???????????? I'm confused, what do you suggest would be best fit for my D5100?
    Thanks for your patience
    Cheers
    Banjo

    D5100, AF-S 18 105, AF-S 10 24.

  14. #14
    It's all about the Light!
    Tech Admin
    Kym's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury, Adelaide
    Posts
    9,632
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Sigma 10-20 is as good if not better than any alternate and a great price as well

    Check the CR Kennedy site for Grey price match options
    regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
    Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff



  15. #15
    Administrator ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    16,846
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Banjo View Post
    I'm new to photography and still trying to get my head around what will and what will not auto focus, there are lots of numbers on lens l don't understand I have a Nikon D5100 with a 18 105 lens. I would like to get more into landscape photos and hence my interest in wide angle lens. Sigma 10-20, Nikkor 10-24, Tokina 12-24 ???????????? I'm confused, what do you suggest would be best fit for my D5100?
    Thanks for your patience
    Nikon Lens nomenclature : http://www.ausphotography.net.au/for...on_Lens_Jargon

    Note that if you buy a Sigma lens for Nikon, you will need to look at the Sigma nomenclature to determine the matching coding. Each manufacturer has their own nomenclature system. ie Nikon call their lenses with Image Stabilisation : VR : lenses, but a Sigma lens to fit Nikon will have : OS : to signify the same thing.

  16. #16
    Member Tommo1965's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Oct 2010
    Location
    Perth Hills Mundaring
    Posts
    1,027
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hi Banjo

    with Nikon lenses you need the letters to say "AFS"...not the older AF or AFD.....AFS lenses have a built in motor the others are what's called screw drive and are wound in and out to focus with the focus motor in some Nikon cameras.. something yours doesn't have

    in other brands it will be called something else..Sigma call it "HSM"
    Cheers and my name is Steve


    OMD Em1...Now with two lenses !

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/steve_tompsett/
    http://tommo.smugmug.com/

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    19 Oct 2011
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks Rick, Kym & Steve


  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    10 May 2012
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'll have to chip in here (albeit late) to say the Sigma 10-20mm lens is fantastic. I beat mine up daily (even riding with it on the MTB) its gets rained on, mud thrown at it, battered but years on still functions brilliantly, crisp photos with no vignetting to speak of. Love the wide end, and I don't find the F speed to be particularly limiting given its wide field of view (the wider they go - the more light they let in). A hearty thumbs up for the Sigma. (Mine is a 1:4.5-5.6 btw).
    Bernie | D800e | D7000 | D70S Infrared | D200 | D2x

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    19 Oct 2011
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have just returned from Hong Kong where l hoped to buy a wide angle lens. Prices there were highter than l expected, just as cheap to buy online in Australia.
    Played it safe and brought the Nikon 10 24 for $850. I checked it out it does have AFS Steve.
    Thanks for your help.

  20. #20
    I am older than I look.
    Join Date
    31 Oct 2009
    Location
    Tura Beach, NSW
    Posts
    3,654
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All Nikon G lenses are AFS - that of course includes the Nikkor 10-24mm zoom.

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •