User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  3
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Ausphotography Forum structure..some housekeeping. I want members thoughts, please

  1. #1
    Administrator ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    15,128
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Ausphotography Forum structure..some housekeeping. I want members thoughts, please

    I am looking at doing a bit of housekeeping of the forums. What I hope to do is tidy up the forum structure a bit.

    What we have so far is below:

    - Put employment opportunities as a sub-forum of Business of Photography
    - Put tutorials and photoshop tutorials as sub-forums of Post Processing Help

    Happy to hear your thoughts on this, and any other suggestions, ideas that would tidy up the forums in any way. Anything can be suggested, including removing a forum completely, moving the order, combining some, adding new ones.

    I just want to hear your thoughts on how we can make the forums tidier and more relevant, in order, topic, content and structure.
    Last edited by ricktas; 25-11-2011 at 6:53am.
    "It is one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it is another thing to make a portrait of who they are" - Paul Caponigro

    Constructive Critique of my photographs is always appreciated
    Nikon, etc!

    RICK
    My Photography

  2. #2
    Ausphotography Regular rene52's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Nov 2009
    Location
    Benalla
    Posts
    1,008
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not sure you can improve it much more. The forum main topics are great and then the break down into other sub-topics is a great idea. I do a bit of IR photography and haven't seen a sub-topic for that area of photography but I suppose I haven't seen many other IR photos either so maybe I just have to put them in Sundry for the time being. I realise that there are quite a few topics and it does need to be controlled - you guys are doing a great job.

  3. #3
    Ausphotography Addict geoffsta's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 May 2010
    Location
    Bruthen, East Gippsland
    Posts
    4,606
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep.. I agree with the employment opportunities, and photoshop tutorials.
    I would like to see a forum for Time Lapse Photography. As we are getting a few of these lately.
    Just a thought.
    Geoff
    Honesty is best policy.
    CC is always welcome
    Nikon D3000 ... Nikon D90... Nikon D700 Various lenses, Home studio equipment and all the associated stuff
    Flickr

  4. #4
    Account Closed Wayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Dec 2009
    Location
    Eastside
    Posts
    1,639
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Makes sense Rick.

  5. #5
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    15,128
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by geoffsta View Post
    Yep.. I agree with the employment opportunities, and photoshop tutorials.
    I would like to see a forum for Time Lapse Photography. As we are getting a few of these lately.
    Just a thought.
    The issue with adding more Photography forums is that if I add time-lapse, then someone will want HDR, and someone else will want long exposure..and on it goes. The photography forums are currently more aimed at genre, rather than method, so keeping it that way seems simpler, and means HDR, Time Lapse etc can go into the relevant forum based on subject matter. But happy to hear what others think

  6. #6
    Ausphotography Addict geoffsta's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 May 2010
    Location
    Bruthen, East Gippsland
    Posts
    4,606
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ricktas View Post
    The issue with adding more Photography forums is that if I add time-lapse, then someone will want HDR, and someone else will want long exposure..and on it goes. The photography forums are currently more aimed at genre, rather than method, so keeping it that way seems simpler, and means HDR, Time Lapse etc can go into the relevant forum based on subject matter. But happy to hear what others think
    I tend to disagree. Time lapse is a completely different genre to the likes of HDR. HDR is closer to a panaramic when all is said and done. The end result of a HDR is still a still image. Where as a time lapse end product is a video. You cannot hang a time lapse on your wall (Unless you have buckets of money)

    Another 2 bob.
    Last edited by geoffsta; 25-11-2011 at 1:29pm.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,837
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thinkm the key objective should be towards simplification

    For example, and i know it's radical

    Animimalia
    People
    Places
    Sport
    Other


    is all that's required in the pictures section

    and

    photography related
    other

    in the non pictures section
    Darren
    Gear : Nikon Goodness
    Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
    Please support Precious Hearts
    Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated

  8. #8
    It's all about the Light!
    Tech Admin
    Kym's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury, Adelaide
    Posts
    9,633
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Time lapse is a special case, but still they usually fall into a genre.
    The genre structure works very well.

    Also: You can use the tag system for marking threads with specific method. I.e. put HDR or Time Lapse into the thread tags then they can be found with ease.
    Last edited by Kym; 25-11-2011 at 1:43pm.
    regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
    Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff



  9. #9
    keen learner of new tricks.
    Join Date
    09 Feb 2009
    Location
    Newcastle, NSW
    Posts
    8,372
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    what about travel? Could there be a specific travel section as many of us travel and have lots of great pics that others can enjoy as well.
    Graeme
    "May the good Lord look down and smile upon your face"......Norman Gunston___________________________________________________
    Nikon: D7000, D80, 12-24 f4, 17-55 f2.8, 18-135, 70-300VR, 35f2, SB 400, SB 600, TC-201 2x converter. Tamron: 90 macro 2.8 Kenko ext. tubes. Photoshop CS2.


  10. #10
    Sunrise Chaser
    Join Date
    10 Jul 2010
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    6,346
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with Graeme, All overseas images should be in one section, EG : Travel, After all it is Australian Photography , Just my opinion
    Canon : 30D, and sometimes the 5D mkIII , Sigma 10-20, 50mm 1.8, Canon 24-105 f4 L , On loan Sigma 120-400 DG and Canon 17 - 40 f4 L , Cokin Filters




  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,837
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    meh, travel, its either an animal, a person or a place

    I travel to my letterbox to take photos sometimes

  12. #12
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Join Date
    08 Nov 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,303
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wouldn't use the term 'genre' to described HDR or time-lapse images.

    HDR is (mostly) a post-processing technique, and time-lapse is a capture technique.

    I'd agree that using genre as a classification technique works well. When you go to the video shop (for those who still do), you look in 'action', 'comedy', etc. You don't look in the non-existent 'movies that were made with a 16mm camera' or 'movies with advanced post-production techniques' sections.

    The challenge, when classifying something, is in determining just how granular or limited in scope you want to be.

    Invariably, someone will consider whatever's decided upon to be too limited in quantity, or too great, such that there are just too many forums. I'm sure Rick is prepared for that reality.

    Perhaps something can be done with 'Tutorials', 'Photoshop Tutorials' and 'Post-Processing Help', as there tends to be a degree of overlap there. Those sections are basically about how to do something, so maybe they can be condensed into sections on the camera capture phase, and the post-processing and image management phase.

    Kiwi,

    You forgot Landscape in your list. I gather you don't shoot landscapes. Others do. 'Nuff said.

    William,

    I'm not sure what merit exists in categorising images based on where they were taken. Some Australian photographers, shoot overseas. If I photographed the Eiffel Tower, the classifications 'Travel', 'Architecture' or even 'Landscape' (cityscape) could apply.

    Does your interpretation of 'Australian Photography' mean only 'images captured in Australia'?

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Jun 2011
    Location
    Innaloo
    Posts
    278
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by William View Post
    I agree with Graeme, All overseas images should be in one section, EG : Travel, After all it is Australian Photography , Just my opinion
    Then our overseas members would constantly have to post in the travel section? I think travel is much like photojournalism, it's another type of photography, but isn't a subject genre.

    Personally I'd like to see some sub-forums in Transport and Sport and Action. Often the thread title is somewhat vague and misleading and I really am not interested in pictures of horseriding or old cruise ships for example. Maybe I should just use the tag system more?
    Ryan

    D800 | Nikkor 24-70mm ƒ/2.8 | Cullmann Tripod |Manfrotto 680B Monopod | Lowepro Flipside 400 AW | 2x Yungnuo 560 flash & wireless trigger| FleaBay Lightstand, umbrella and collapsible softbox
    My Flickr site
    RSK Photography - Perth based Motorsport Photography

  14. #14
    Administrator
    Threadstarter
    ricktas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    15,128
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    As suggested by Kym, if members get in the habit of tagging their threads as they create them, we have a powerful search feature in that alone. If every one tagged their photos taken in France for example, a quick tag search would find all of them for those interested. On the site home page we have a tag cloud that increases the size of the font relative to how many times the word has been used as a tag recently.

    The tagging system built into the site is very powerful and a great way to find relevant threads and photos, but perhaps we need to encourage members to use it more frequently, in particular when they post photo threads.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Jun 2011
    Location
    Innaloo
    Posts
    278
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've seen other forums auto-populate the tag fields with the words in the thread title. This can help massively, however it does rely on people accurately spelling/describing their subject in the thread title. The good thing is that a thread title can be changed if it is grossly vague.

    Either that or you could makle tagging a complusory field when creating a new thread?
    Last edited by 98kellrs; 25-11-2011 at 5:41pm. Reason: Lack of spelling ability

  16. #16
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Join Date
    08 Nov 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,303
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I mostly use the tag system when I post an image, but sometimes I find the limitation of five tags, err, limiting.

    I tend to very liberally tag my image pages on Flickr with relevant, useful tags.

    I cannot say I've used the tag cloud here or searched by tag, but as long as it's useful to others, that's enough incentive to continue tagging.

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,837
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Actually I did

    Landscapes go in "places"

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Sep 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    861
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Re: photos
    I agree with Kiwi (statistically, it was bound to happen eventually ). other forums have gone down the path of creating loads of categories but no one visits them all. whatever the first 5 or so on the page is where the traffic is.
    simplify.
    we're just here to check out each other photos...it's not a travel brochure. the himalayas or my back garden - why should it matter?
    be it a lion in the wild or your pet gerbil. who cares? the only interest is the resulting image and how it was taken.
    fans of night photography don't have anything against sunlight do they?
    Last edited by sunny6teen; 26-11-2011 at 12:15am.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •