Just wondering if anyone has any idea about the longevity (degradation) of prints from the likes of the Epson A3/A2 as compared to chemical developed photo lab pictures.
 |
  |
 |
Thanks useful information: 0
Just wondering if anyone has any idea about the longevity (degradation) of prints from the likes of the Epson A3/A2 as compared to chemical developed photo lab pictures.
Website - McGoo Photography
Sean | Olympus E5 | Olympus e620 | Zuiko 7-14 | Zuiko 35-100 SHG | Zuiko 14-54 | Zuiko 70-300 | OM 50mm | Panagor macro converter | CPL filter | FL-50R flash |
Most all Quality, Printing paper gives a life of 100yrs, That'l do meI suppose depending on the operator you'd expect the Lab ones to last longer maybe
Canon : 30D, and sometimes the 5D mkIII , Sigma 10-20, 50mm 1.8, Canon 24-105 f4 L , On loan Sigma 120-400 DG and Canon 17 - 40 f4 L , Cokin Filters
Some light reading on this subject.
http://www.wilhelm-research.com/
Mark
Canon 70D w/Grip l Canon 60D w/Grip l EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS USM l EF 70-200 f4L IS USM l EF-S 15-85 f3.5-5.6 IS USM l EF 100 f2.8 USM Macro l EF-S 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM l EF 50 f1.8 II l Canon EF-S 10-22 f3.5-4.5 USM l 430 EX II Flash l Rode Stereo VideoMic l Manfrotto 055XPROB + 498RC2 Tripod l Benro MP-96 M8 Monopod l Lowepro Vertex 200 AW Backpack l Lowepro Pro Runner 300 AW Backpack l PS CS5 Extended l Lightroom 4.3
a pro lab using wet printing will be superior to home printing; there are no free lunches. paper might be rated as archival, but the inks are just as important.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Add To Bookmarks
