User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  12
Results 1 to 20 of 44

Thread: 100m f/2.8L or no L?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    23 Jul 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    655
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Is it advisable to use a tripod collar with the L version when mounting it on a tripod, or is it ok to just mount it by the camera body, because I see the collar is nearly $300 alone.
    Jayde

    Honest CC whether good or bad, is much appreciated.
    Love and enjoy photography, but won't be giving up my day job.

    Flickr

  2. #2
    Ausphotography Regular
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    14 Dec 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    693
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dulvariprestige View Post
    Is it advisable to use a tripod collar with the L version when mounting it on a tripod, or is it ok to just mount it by the camera body, because I see the collar is nearly $300 alone.
    I assumed the collar isn't required because it doesn't come with one. But that's just me... Hoping no collar is required anyway.

  3. #3
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Join Date
    08 Nov 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,303
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Fedgrub View Post
    I assumed the collar isn't required because it doesn't come with one. But that's just me... Hoping no collar is required anyway.
    The lens weighs 625g, and isn't long or front-heavy.

    A collar isn't necessary.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •