I often see arguments about lens vs sensor image stabilisation.
Here is Nikon's view.
Makes sense to me!
 |
  |
 |
Thanks useful information: 2
I often see arguments about lens vs sensor image stabilisation.
Here is Nikon's view.
Makes sense to me!
I won't need to read it to say it makes sense to me too
Darren
Gear : Nikon Goodness
Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
Please support Precious Hearts
Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated
They would say that wouldn't they? ( http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mandy_Rice-Davies )
Pentax gives you both options, in body and with Sigma releasing OS on longer FL lenses for Pentax - can't lose.
Every lens is stabilised with Pentax.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=19647176
regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff
Threadstarter
, two predictable replies!
Last edited by etherial; 14-07-2011 at 9:47pm.
Originally Posted by etherial
The age of entitlement isn't over, it's just over there where you can't get to it.
When several possibilities exist, the simplest solution is the best.
"There are no rules" Bruce Barnbaum, The art of Photography
Graham
Lol, quite
So If I chime in and say that, for bird photography, you really need to go with Canon or Nikon and the Nikon long glass is just as good as the Canon but costs a lot more for no good reason ... we would have three entirely predictable replies?
LOL quite
Can I suggest that I agree with Kym's predictable reply and add that Sony also offer in body for all lenses and with sigma IS on longer lenses, we have a choice
Reply With Quote
Add To Bookmarks
