I often see arguments about lens vs sensor image stabilisation.
Here is Nikon's view.
Makes sense to me!
I won't need to read it to say it makes sense to me too
Gear : Nikon Goodness
Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
Please support Precious Hearts
Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated
They would say that wouldn't they? ( http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mandy_Rice-Davies )
Pentax gives you both options, in body and with Sigma releasing OS on longer FL lenses for Pentax - can't lose.
Every lens is stabilised with Pentax.
regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff
, two predictable replies!
Last edited by etherial; 14-07-2011 at 8:47pm.
So If I chime in and say that, for bird photography, you really need to go with Canon or Nikon and the Nikon long glass is just as good as the Canon but costs a lot more for no good reason ... we would have three entirely predictable replies?
Can I suggest that I agree with Kym's predictable reply and add that Sony also offer in body for all lenses and with sigma IS on longer lenses, we have a choice