User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Digging up a Nikon FM2...

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    05 Jun 2011
    Location
    Tullamore
    Posts
    700
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    would love to see your results
    All experts were once beginners

    Nikon D3100 18 55 kit lens Nikon 35 mm Nikon 70 300mm optex tripod



    MWAH! Sandy

  2. #22
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    921
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't think I will be able to finish the other 3/4 so I will just roll it up and develop it tomorrow. Will upload the result tomorrow.


  3. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    05 Jun 2011
    Location
    Tullamore
    Posts
    700
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    that is today now will keep coming back

  4. #24
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    921
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry for the delay - was a little busy an then AP was down due to upgrade or something....








    First thing I realise from this experiment is - without VR, telephoto is difficult!

    Out of 24 photos, only probably 14 is sharp (6 of them were completely destroyed due to me stuff up when try to reverse the used film back into the roll) Only 18 were developed.

    The flare control of the lens is not exactly exceptional, but having say that - it seems film can record more dynamic range? Some of the sample were pretty much facing to the sun, but instead of complete dark shadow, I got quite a bit of details in the picture

  5. #25
    Member nightbringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Mar 2011
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    92
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like the last two, the portraits turned out really nice.

  6. #26
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    921
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep, I am kind of surprise how well the pics turn out. But I was hoping the neg scanner would be better. When I zoom in more the pixel is terrible

  7. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    08 Oct 2010
    Location
    Greenwich
    Posts
    1,704
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get a holder and then take a digital photo of the transparency and you won't lose as much quality.
    All my photos are taken with recycled pixels.
    Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit.
    Wisdom, is knowing not to serve it in a fruit salad.

  8. #28
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    921
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good idea But I think I will just leave it as it is. A bit of learning experience and a bit of fun. Learn a few small things about how to achieve proper exposure - something we all read all the time in any photography technical article, but never really remember to do so

    Got another 2 rolls to muck around with - but missus is not happy about the $13.95 cost for each roll to be processed.... plus she only kept the pics I took with the Canon on the same day

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •