User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  1
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Rights to Photos for advertising purposes

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    30 Mar 2007
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rights to Photos for advertising purposes

    Hey guys

    Wondering if anyone knows the answer here. We were hired to shoot a wedding early this year, including reception at the required venue. The images were provided to the bride and groom as part of their package and it would appear they have given one of these images (at least one that we know of) to the venue, and the venue are now using this image printed in magazines and ad boards throughout the club to advertise their events, without any mention or credit to us. Neither party sought our permission to use these photos for advertising purposes. Is this venue legally allowed to use these photos for their own promotional purposes?

    As we understand it (correct us if we are wrong), the bride and groom are legally allowed to use the photos in any manner they wish, but are a third party allowed to do so?

    Any help appreciated.
    Constructive criticism welcomed!!

    Website
    www.rememberthisphotography.net

    Facebook Page
    http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/p...9901187?ref=ts

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,831
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Who owns th copyright owns the photos I'd say, unless you have a contract that states otherwise
    Darren
    Gear : Nikon Goodness
    Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
    Please support Precious Hearts
    Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated

  3. #3
    Account Closed Wayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Dec 2009
    Location
    Eastside
    Posts
    1,639
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My understanding is that unless by way of contract the client (assuming the client paid you for them) has rescinded their automatic copyright (given they are wedding pics), then they own the pics, and they may then permit under whatever agreement with any other party they like the use of those pics.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,831
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with Wayne. I'm not sure what your contract says re copyright but if it's mute then they own the copyright by default and I think you're probably powerless with how those images are used

  5. #5
    Member jeffde's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Nov 2006
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    509
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree, my contract says though that the client can't sell the images - maybe i should include don't give away.

    Maybe approach the venue say you have this and other's do they want some more - could lead to more business....
    Jeff - Jeff D Photography
    Canon -
    http://jeffdphoto.ifp3.com/
    www.jeffdphotography.com.au


  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,831
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nopt sure that would work Jeff - you probably say that they are not to be for personal and non-commercial use only though

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    18 Aug 2010
    Location
    shepparton
    Posts
    2,682
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    go to the venue and see if you can put a buisness card on the bottom of shot
    cheers macca

  8. #8
    Account Closed Wayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Dec 2009
    Location
    Eastside
    Posts
    1,639
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffde View Post
    maybe i should include don't give away.
    I think that inserting such a clause, would drive people away. When my sister in law got married a few months back, she sent me the contract for a potential photographer who had a set of terms which basically said he owned everything and you could use the pics under license forever, but they can not be sold, re-distributed, gifted among other things. I drafted some proposed amendments to his terms and put them to him for consideration. I pointed out that wedding pics would automatically have copyright with the client unless contracted otherwise, and that this term was not acceptable, along with the other restrictions on use/distribution. The photographer replied with a huge speil about why he wanted to keep copyright, restrict use etc etc and that he was not willing to omit those terms unless his fee was increased by 50%.

    I then had the pleasure of telling him that he wouldn't be getting the work, and the $4800 (for a few days work inc PP and a few prints which we know are obtained very cheaply) would be going to someone else. Two weeks later, he contacted my SIL again, and said he was prepared to re-negotiate, and that he would agree to my terms to secure the work. I then had the pleasure of telling him a 2nd time that he wouldn't be getting the work, and he should have thought of better business sense 2 weeks earlier.

    Lots of people don't read fine print as we all know, but including such things as standard form, could turn people away before you even get a chance to close a deal....

  9. #9
    Member jeffde's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Nov 2006
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    509
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    [QUOTE=Wayne;875320]I think that inserting such a clause, would drive people away.

    I agree (as with Kiwi's comment) but saying they can't be used for commercial use without permission and/or payment should be Ok ,

    I say they can gift to family friends etc - no problem there...

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,831
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wayne, by the way, I'm not sure that clause re photo diustribution that you complained about is all that uncommon. Id say (and yes I am speculating) that a lot of the top end guys make most their cream from additional print sales to the grandma etc on top and above the original pacakage price

  11. #11
    Account Closed Wayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Dec 2009
    Location
    Eastside
    Posts
    1,639
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would agree, and the principle is the same, however believe most punters would try to prevent re-distribution to grandma, parents etc by retaining copyright rather than prescribing re-distribution as a term of the deal. Then they try to sell further prints. To my SIL, that is an unreasonable term and she wanted it excluded.

  12. #12
    Member James T's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Jan 2010
    Location
    St Kilda
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You should have it written into your terms of trade that they assign the copyright to you as a condition of you taking on the job. Then you can choose to hand back whatever rights you like, either included in the package, or at additional cost.

    If you didn't have this stipulation (or something similar) then you probably just have to let it go, as they're free to do what they want with them.

    Crazy law to adjust to after moving from the UK.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    19 Feb 2009
    Location
    Blue Mountains
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If its not covered in your contract then its almost as if the horse has bolted ...

  14. #14
    Member A Zed's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Mar 2011
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    part of the paragraph from my contract, which I think i got from elsewhere. Probably doesnt cover this if they didnt sell it, might need to change some wording

    ownership of the resulting images will be transferred to THE CLIENT under the
    following conditions:

    • The digital images are the property of THE CLIENT for personal use and for the
    purposes of the reproduction and distribution of photographs to friends and relatives.
    • THE CLIENT must obtain written permission from, and compensate "me" prior to an event where THE CLIENT, THE CLIENT’S friends or relatives
    publish or sell the photographs for profit.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •