Canon 400 mm F5.6 L or Sigma 150-500mm for bird photographs

[ving]

Must be Dan from IIS - Hi!

Sigma 150-500 was 869, Canon 100-400 was 1529, so about 76% more.

ving from IIS here
I have thousand of posts there

anyhow if i had a canon rather than nikon then the 100-400L would be what i would get. however being a nikon user i am using the 150-500 siggy. a fine lens but not as sharp as the canon 100-400L

[Patrick K]

Hi Ving,

I recognise your distinct handle. I suspect there are a lot of IISers here - it all feels quite familiar as a result. And thanks for the thumbs up - I feel very confident with my purchase

ving from IIS here
I have thousand of posts there

anyhow if i had a canon rather than nikon then the 100-400L would be what i would get. however being a nikon user i am using the 150-500 siggy. a fine lens but not as sharp as the canon 100-400L