Oi vay! Such humour!
The point of the thread was to raise awareness, and to show some, that their monitor basic brightness & contrast was either way off or maybe somewhere near sane.
Oi vay! Such humour!
The point of the thread was to raise awareness, and to show some, that their monitor basic brightness & contrast was either way off or maybe somewhere near sane.
Last edited by ricktas; 14-06-2011 at 7:19am.
regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff
Last edited by ricktas; 14-06-2011 at 7:21am.
"It is one thing to make a picture of what a person looks like, it is another thing to make a portrait of who they are" - Paul Caponigro
Constructive Critique of my photographs is always appreciated
Nikon, etc!
RICK
My Photography
Thanks Kym for this handy little strip, my computer seems to be sane
CC most welcome
Canon 7D
Canon Lens EF 24-105mm L IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro
I found it much easier to see against the background provided by the black stealth skin, rather than the site default one. I can at least now distinguish the last black bar.
It now has a grey band Refresh if needed
Great tool for checking your monitors brightness, I struggled so much with calibrating my monitor that I finally purchased a Monitor Calibrator (well Xmas Present) I put a second monitor on and it calibrated that as well there are some slight differences between the monitors but you have to stare hard to see the difference. And the Bar Below, I see all which is reassuring (yes I know it should lol)
Oh by the way in reading some of the below posts I have the version that adjusts for ambient light I Highly reccomend it. Am new to the Forum hoping I can contribute as well as learn a lot
Many thanks! It's a great help!
Thanks for putting it at the top again. Works well, but I have trouble seeing the Gamma cal using that QuickGamma that is linked. Any advice with that?
From this? http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/
We don't manage that site so you will need to ask there.
In the end the best calibration is with a device.
I was looking for something like this, thanks for posting.
Canon 40D
Everything seems to be OK here
Thanks for this useful info.
Thanks for this thread! I'm seeing each of the bars now.
Looks fine on a 1920 x 1080 LCD screen
Thanks Kym
Thanks for this, all looks ok.
Thanks very much for that, I appreciate the effort put into it. It's always great to find that your monitor is working against a variety of tests. It also shows that my calibration tools are working well. That said, do you know much about the new Spyder4 and if they made such improvements with it that one "should" replace Spyder3?
The spyder4 was an upgrade, and basically uses the same colorimeter as the 3 version. The colorimeter changed a lot between spyder 2 and spyder 3.
Last edited by ricktas; 10-12-2013 at 7:27pm.
Thankyou that was very handy
I recently re-calibrated my monitor. happy to distinguish the 33 shades
Seems good enough to me