User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  1
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: what fisheye lens??

  1. #1
    Member kieran03's Avatar
    Join Date
    26 May 2011
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    what fisheye lens??

    g'day,
    looking at getting a fisheye lens for my canon eos 600d. can people recommend what they are using or what they would suggest?? had been looking at the canon 8-15mm fish eye lens, something with a zoom would be nice rather then fixed.

    i know alot of people don't like the fisheye lens & say not to buy one...but only really interested in comments from people who either own a fisheye lens or can recommend something.

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Site Rules Breach - Permanent Ban
    Join Date
    03 Aug 2010
    Location
    Coombabah
    Posts
    1,765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi kieran03
    I have a Sigma 10-20 wide angle lens.
    Your sensor is about the same size as mine 22 x 14 mm.
    There are wide angle, ultra-wide-angle & fisheye
    The 10-20 will give you a clear picture without any vignette.
    The 8-15 I think will give you a circle or near to a circle with vignette at 8mm.
    Less then 8mm will be a circle of view with distortion around the outsides (trees or buildings arching on the sides).
    Col

  3. #3
    Serial Truant....
    Join Date
    01 Jun 2008
    Location
    Launceston
    Posts
    592
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a Canon 15mm fisheye (I am one of the like fisheye brigade), not that fishy on a crop sensor, so not really suited to tour body. I've seen excellent results from a Sigma 10mm fisheye lens on a crop body (comparable with the 15mm on Full Frame) and the performance at the edges, particularly coma is better on the Sigma than the Canon. The Siggy 10mm will fully illuminate a crop sensor and give around 180 degree view.

  4. #4
    can't remember Tannin's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Huon Valley
    Posts
    4,122
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Fisheye is far too specalised a tool to even think about getting a prime when there are zooms available.

    The Canon 8-15 is not really usable on full-frame (unless you call a circular fish "usable", which I don't) and costs almost exactly twice as much as the Tokina 10-17 - which is also not suited to full-frame, and is only half-useful on APS-H. Superb little lens on ordinary APS-C though. I imagine that the IQ of the Canon L Series 8-15 will be outstanding, but I can't really imagine what it would actually achieve in real life that the Pentax/Tokina doesn't achieve.
    Tony

    It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.

  5. #5
    can't remember Tannin's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Huon Valley
    Posts
    4,122
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    23 Apr 2010
    Location
    Allens Rivulet
    Posts
    462
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got the Samyang 8mm fisheye, using on a cropped sensor Nikon D90. This lens is pretty cheap, and gives quite good results - better than I expected.
    I'll find a link to a thread later today, and post up a couple more recent pics tonight that I took recently.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    23 Apr 2010
    Location
    Allens Rivulet
    Posts
    462
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey Kieran,

    These couple still need decent post-processing. The courtyard/exercise yard is a bit extreme at the mo, but they do show the field of view a fisheye gives. It's not something I regularly use; once I'd had enough of being locked into a closed maximum security mental health facility recently I whipped this lens out for a few shots.


    Fisheye_MainExerciseYard resize by ScottM70, on Flickr


    Fisheye_CBlock Rec Rm by ScottM70, on Flickr
    Last edited by ScottM; 07-06-2011 at 12:42am.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    24 Jan 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the Sigma 8mm F3.5 fisheye it is a full-circle 180deg on a full-frame or 180x114deg vignetting lens on a crop sensor. Its a prime, so no zoom. I only got it so I could stitch 360x180 panoramas and virtual tours. I occassionally pull it out to make one of those silly "big-nose" portraits but it would be my least used lens these days as the virtual tour fad seems to have come to an end.
    Last edited by Keith Young; 07-06-2011 at 12:55am.
    D7000, D300, Nikkor 50mm F1.4D, Nikkor 18-200mm, Tokina 11-16mm F2.8, Sigma 8mm F3.5, SB800, 3x SB600


  9. #9
    Member
    Threadstarter
    kieran03's Avatar
    Join Date
    26 May 2011
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    no worries. thanks for the info...
    looking more into it, to get the effect i'm wanting need to get a full frame camera. the alternative lens been looking at is the wide angle zoom canon ef-s 10-22mm lens.

  10. #10
    Site Rules Breach - Permanent Ban
    Join Date
    03 Aug 2010
    Location
    Coombabah
    Posts
    1,765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The alternative is to get wide converters to add some more width to a wide lens ??
    This will get you a circle image.
    Col

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    19 Aug 2010
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    628
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tannin View Post
    Fisheye is far too specalised a tool to even think about getting a prime when there are zooms available.

    The Canon 8-15 is not really usable on full-frame (unless you call a circular fish "usable", which I don't) and costs almost exactly twice as much as the Tokina 10-17 - which is also not suited to full-frame, and is only half-useful on APS-H. Superb little lens on ordinary APS-C though. I imagine that the IQ of the Canon L Series 8-15 will be outstanding, but I can't really imagine what it would actually achieve in real life that the Pentax/Tokina doesn't achieve.
    the 8-15 is a zoom. At 15mm it will not produce a circular fisheye effect on FF camera.
    1DIII, 5DII, 15mm fish, 24mm ts-e, 35L,135L,200L,400L,mpe-65mm
    Film: eos 300, pentax 6x7

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    19 Aug 2010
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    628
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kieran03 View Post
    g'day,
    looking at getting a fisheye lens for my canon eos 600d. can people recommend what they are using or what they would suggest?? had been looking at the canon 8-15mm fish eye lens, something with a zoom would be nice rather then fixed.

    i know alot of people don't like the fisheye lens & say not to buy one...but only really interested in comments from people who either own a fisheye lens or can recommend something.

    Thanks
    I believe samyang have a manual focus 8mm fisheye and also sigma has a 8mm fisheye that will give that extreme fisheye effect. I also think the 8mm sig will have some of the corners cut off on your 600D.
    The best idea is searching google for images of each lens.
    Also, if you are considering ultra wide lenses, you may consider a ultra wide rectilinear lens such as canon 14mm, 10-22mm (and there are some other lenses made by other manufacturers that have a similar range). The image is corrected so it is not as wide as the respective fisheye lens, but still quite wide.

  13. #13
    can't remember Tannin's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Huon Valley
    Posts
    4,122
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^ that's what I said, Fabian. It would doubtless be a very nice lens indeed on APS-C, but barely usable on full-frame because you are stuck at the long end of the zoom range. (Unless, that is, you regard a circular fish as useful, which I don't.) Why buy a zoom that you can't use the zoom range on? You might as well save the money, the weight, and the complication, and buy a fisheye prime in the first place.

    (EDIT: two posts up, I mean)
    Last edited by Tannin; 08-06-2011 at 12:01am.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    19 Aug 2010
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    628
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think if you are buying a fisheye you are pretty comitted to going very wide I think canon is just killing two birds with one stone. Most people will probably use the lens at 15mm the most, but it is to have the ability to go to a circular image if you desire it. It also means anyone who buys this wont have any need to competitor lenses, since canon doesnt have a cir fisheye at the moment.

  15. #15
    Member dannat's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Nov 2010
    Location
    WOODEND
    Posts
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Zenitar do make a cheap 15mm fisheye, manual focus only

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •