User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  13
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: To IS or to not IS?? that is the question!

  1. #21
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Join Date
    08 Nov 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,303
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by yummymummy View Post
    Ok, so I'm getting a new lens in the coming months, been doing a bit of research, and want to know, I am getting the Canon 70-200 F2.8, but can't really decide whether to get IS or not. None of my other lenses have IS, and I seem to do fine with them Thoughts??
    I would always choose a lens with IS if it were available (and incidentally, I've always done so).

    IS is useful at any focal length, not just for use in low light, but whenever there is instability (eg, you're on a boat, or it's very windy).

    If you have the budget, go for the IS version.

  2. #22
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    28 Jan 2009
    Location
    Logan Reserve, QLD
    Posts
    2,874
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks everyone!
    Happy to take all constructive Critique, please don't rework or edit my photos. Thanks!

    Canon 6D, 2 Canon 50D's gripped, Canon 1000D, Canon 70-200 F2.8 ( non IS),Canon 70-200 2.8, Canon 24-70 2.8, Sigma 85 1.4, Canon 50mm F1.8.. yongnuo speedlights and triggers, and manfrotto tripods.


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •