Hmmm...am I allowed to swear on this forum But knowing my luck, that is exactly what would happen
Hmmm...am I allowed to swear on this forum But knowing my luck, that is exactly what would happen
D610 and D90 with a 16-35mm f/4,a 70-200mm f/4 ,a 300mm f/4 +TC11 convertor, 18-200mmDX and 85mm micro Dx.
Sally...CC always appreciated
My Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/salnel
Of course you are, the automatic forum censor takes care of the reallyun lady likenot generally acceptable utterings anyway.
As I have often said before, Nikon simply does not make a lens that compares with the Canon 100-400 with the all important specifications of VR / IS, weight, fast focus ability, optical quality and price in the one package. If they had made such a lens a few years ago they would have sold millions of them.
The only other lens that comes close is the Sigma 100-300 F/4 + 1.4 tc ( recently discontinued and maybe replaced with an OS / VR / IS version ) and then that fails the VR / IS needs and falls behind slightly on weight.
If birds are your thing then the suggested Canon combinations by those who know in this thread make perfect sense, waiting and hoping for Nikon to produce something competitive might mean a lot of missed bird shots.
Thanks, Kym...not too sure "affordable" is a prerequisite for Nikon tele lenses
Think you might be right, Andrew...well,it looks like I will be stepping in to the edges of the dark side...Now to start saving!
Thanks, everyone for your input...much appreciated