User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  10
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Saving images for online????????????

  1. #1
    Member Jacs14's Avatar
    Join Date
    13 Feb 2010
    Location
    Murrumba Downs
    Posts
    585
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Saving images for online????????????

    I just received an email from a nice guy on flickr, warning me about the fact that I had saved my images in large file size online, it made it easy for them to be downloaded and basically used without my knowledge or consent. Now for you guys who don't know me, I do not have a clue when it comes to anything technical and computers and me are an incredibly scary combination!!

    So what I basically need to know is ...

    1. should I save in two different sizes, 1 for online and 1 for printing??
    2. how & what size do I save in, that will also work for uploading to AP.
    3. should I start to add a watermark to my images to help protect them??

    Sorry for sounding really stupid, there are some things I'm good at but its not computers

  2. #2
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Join Date
    28 Jan 2009
    Location
    Logan Reserve, QLD
    Posts
    2,874
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ok, well I can only tell you what I do. when I'm saving, I save one for web at a smaller size, with a watermark, and one at the original size without the watermark. I just usually save as though I'm saving for AP, 1024 on the longest side, and 250kb. I hope that helps!
    Happy to take all constructive Critique, please don't rework or edit my photos. Thanks!

    Canon 6D, 2 Canon 50D's gripped, Canon 1000D, Canon 70-200 F2.8 ( non IS),Canon 70-200 2.8, Canon 24-70 2.8, Sigma 85 1.4, Canon 50mm F1.8.. yongnuo speedlights and triggers, and manfrotto tripods.


  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    09 Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane - Bayside
    Posts
    3,416
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The photos I save for Flickr are the same size I need for uploading to AP. No bigger. No matter what size you save to. Anyone can use your photos from there so you can't protect them. Tell you the truth, it doesn't bother me. I suppose it would if they said they took it but other than that I'm not sure you can do anything about it.
    I save my photos to 900 on the longest side and save to what ever under 250MB.
    Thanks for looking....Cheers,
    Julie-Anne / Julie / Jules / Julesy / JAS

    MY ..... MY BLOG..... Feel free to look.
    Canon 40D / 24-105mm L IS / 70-200mm L IS / 75-300mm / 50mm 1.8 / Sigma 10-20mm / Manfrotto tripod / Bits and pieces to fill the bag.


  4. #4
    Moderately Underexposed
    Join Date
    04 May 2007
    Location
    Marlo, Far East Gippsland
    Posts
    4,902
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jacs14 View Post
    So what I basically need to know is ...

    1. should I save in two different sizes, 1 for online and 1 for printing??

    Yes, save the file that you want to print as a full resolution copy and any web "published" ones as a low resolution example.

    2. how & what size do I save in, that will also work for uploading to AP.

    When uploading to the public forums, if they are in a horizontal format stick to 1024 px wide and if they are a vertical file then 800 px high usually fits well on most monitors. If you are linking the files from another hosting site the physical size ( kb ) is unimportant but if you are entering them in a competition here or attaching them to a thread the physical size must ne no more than 250kb.

    A very handy program for doing it all for you after a bit of study is BD sizer and best of all it is free from ---- http://www.idimager.com/downloads/freeware



    3. should I start to add a watermark to my images to help protect them??

    Watermarks tend to spoil good images to me and can be removed by skilled software jockeys, rather look at it as that if you upload a high resolution image to flikr, facebook etc. etc. or anywhere on the web it is fair game for theft if someone really wants it. Best to stick with low resolution images that won't print well and accept the fact that the web is a happy hunting ground of image "borrowers".
    Andrew
    Nikon, Fuji, Nikkor, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina and too many other bits and pieces to list.



  5. #5
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Jacs14's Avatar
    Join Date
    13 Feb 2010
    Location
    Murrumba Downs
    Posts
    585
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the feedback
    Last edited by Jacs14; 18-05-2011 at 7:45pm.

  6. #6
    Ausphotography Site Sponsor/Advertiser DAdeGroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Feb 2009
    Location
    Cedar Creek, Qld, Australia
    Posts
    1,890
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As other have mentioned, if you keep your online files around 1024px on the long edge it does make it more difficult to exploit the images you display online. (Note, that's still plenty big enough for people to use on the web).
    Watermarking can help reduce outright theft, but anyone with decent photoshop skills can likely get around that too.

    Print size should obviously be exported at the size of the print you're making. LR can do all of this for you (or PS, or most other image editing packages).
    Dave

    http://www.degrootphotography.com.au/
    Canon EOS 1D MkIV | Canon EOS 5D MkII | Canon EOS 30D | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM | Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM | Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L & some non-L lenses.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    30 Apr 2011
    Location
    Sydney (Pennant Hills)
    Posts
    341
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All the advice given above is good. I will say just one thing more, In Australia, copyright is always to the creator and photos which I sell I don't put on any website but I have caught some people using my photos from my website at sydneynaturally and using it for commercial purposes...one was used on a tourist brochure (large Sydney tourist operator) and another used my images to create templates for embroidery. In both cases I got my Solicitor to deal with it and in both cases I received substantial monetary damages for their efforts. They weren't photos I was trying to sell so the reward was unexpected. What's the point I'm getting at? Keep your eyes open and you might make a windfall like me for very little effort <grin>!
    DON - Teachable, always learning, always experimenting, just want to know everything I can about photography!

  8. #8
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Jacs14's Avatar
    Join Date
    13 Feb 2010
    Location
    Murrumba Downs
    Posts
    585
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thanks for the feedback ... ok so here goes, I have had a go at saving onto flickr which seems to have worked ok, now to see if it works when I upload to here


  9. #9
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Jacs14's Avatar
    Join Date
    13 Feb 2010
    Location
    Murrumba Downs
    Posts
    585
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    it worked ... THANK YOU!!

  10. #10
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    15 Sep 2010
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Even the 1024 pixel size could be made into a 6x4 print if someone wanted to steal it so I have read.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    26 Nov 2008
    Location
    Booval, Qld (near Ipswich)
    Posts
    2,018
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    just one more thing that I can see that anyone has mentioned. when saving to web, use 72dpi, when saving for printing use 240dpi. hope that makes sense too.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Actually a 250k file 1024 wide makes a nice 8" x 10"
    Darren
    Gear : Nikon Goodness
    Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
    Please support Precious Hearts
    Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated

  13. #13
    Site Rules Breach - Permanent Ban
    Join Date
    03 Aug 2010
    Location
    Coombabah
    Posts
    1,765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can almost smell the rain hitting that dirt road
    Col

  14. #14
    Shore Crawler Dylan & Marianne's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Mar 2009
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    9,333
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    lol darren has pointed out that before :P
    we tested it out as well since for the weddings, we provided the clients with all the usable photos at 100dpi 1024 long edge - they print OK up to 8X10 (can tell the difference if put side by side with a 300 dpi image)
    my workflow is to save as a TIFF for printing and then I have an action to resize for web (1024 long edge, 100dpi, border , watermark etc)
    for what it's worth, on our smugmug site, we chose a right click protect option but there are always ways to get the image anyway.
    Call me Dylan! www.everlookphotography.com | www.everlookphotography.wordpress.com | www.flickr.com/photos/dmtoh
    Canon EOS R5, : 16-35mm F4 L, 70-200F4 canon L, 24-70mm 2.8IIcanon L, Sirui tripod + K20D ballhead + RRS ballhead. |Sony A7r2 + Laowa 12mm F2.8, Nisi 15mm F4
    Various NiSi systems : Currently using switch filter and predominantly 6 stop ND, 10 stop ND, 3 stop medium GND
    Post : Adobe lightroom classic CC : Photoshop CC. Various actions for processing and web export

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    18 May 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've always been told that 72DPI is more than enough for online display & like the other posters, I stick to around a max of 1024. I'm curious about to watermark or not - but indeed, it can be removed - especially as most people place it in a corner so it doesn't obstruct the image. I guess it is a deterrent. Love the photo - it's a cracker!
    Sarah
    www.sarahwhytephotography.com


    Canon EOS 7D | Canon EOS 350D | Canon EFS 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon EFS 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 IS USM | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 | Canon EFS 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

  16. #16
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Jacs14's Avatar
    Join Date
    13 Feb 2010
    Location
    Murrumba Downs
    Posts
    585
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the feedback ... looks like the way you suggested has saved ok for on here so thats good I can still use it and get cc

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    20 Jul 2009
    Location
    Central Coast, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I actually put mine up full size on Smugmug. Then I protect them with a password. Now I don't make a living with my photos and I trust the password to be safe enough. I can then share the password with my family.

    For those shots I link to this site, I upload a second copy and reduce the size of the photo at 72dpi.

    So I have all my photos backed up without external disk or DVDs and I can share with family at the same time.

    All at a cost of AU$35 per annum - Bargain! And I can format the screen as I like it and no adds.
    Best Regards, Mark (Criticism encouraged on all my photos. Thanking you for your guidance).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •