 |
  |
 |
Thanks useful information: 77
Well from where I sit you need to study Quote of the Day a bit less and pick up some Dale Carnegie! Advocating doesn't equate with Winning either!Originally Posted by ElectricImages
I've studied and advocated on related rights issues for over a decade, and I'm unlikely to change my mind given that there's a lot of fear, and very few facts here (in this thread) to change it.
Waz
Be who you are and say what you mean, because those who matter don't mind don't matter and those who mind don't matter - Dr. Seuss...
D700 x 2 | Nikkor AF 50 f/1.8D | Nikkor AF 85 f/1.8D | Optex OPM2930 tripod/monopod | Enthusiasm ...
When is this thread going to end.
We have been here not that long ago.
Geoff
Honesty is best policy.
CC is always welcome
Nikon D3000 ... Nikon D90... Nikon D700 Various lenses, Home studio equipment and all the associated stuff
Flickr
And that doesn't equate to a reasoned rebuttal.Well from where I sit you need to study Quote of the Day a bit less and pick up some Dale Carnegie! Advocating doesn't equate with Winning either!Try again!
--=3 In Veritas Lux E=--
Bodies: Canon EOS 5D Mk II, Canon EOS 550D
Lenses: EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
Strobist: 2 x Speedlite 580EXII, 4 x Yongnuo RF-603 Radio Tranceivers, Yongnuo ST-E2 IR Transmitter
3 x Manfrotto Light Stands, 2 x Softboxes, 2 x Bounce Brollies
Tripod: Vanguard Alta Pro 263AT, PH-50 Panhead
No one forcing or exploiting you to open the link, are theyWhen is this thread going to end.
We have been here not that long ago.
That's it Col.. Your next CC will be an absolute shocker.......No one forcing or exploiting you to open the link, are they
Seen the same arguements on the thread that related to that photographer who took photos of children and claimed it as art. It ended fairly heated. I feel this thread will end the same.
I read this thread cause I enjoy some of the comments, and what people feel on the subject. It's all healthy until someone gets hurt.
Why? You've already admitted you have closed mind on the subject.And that doesn't equate to a reasoned rebuttal.
I will be expecting some real shocker crits too & for a long timeThat's it Col.. Your next CC will be an absolute shocker.......
Seen the same arguements on the thread that related to that photographer who took photos of children and claimed it as art. It ended fairly heated. I feel this thread will end the same.
I read this thread cause I enjoy some of the comments, and what people feel on the subject. It's all healthy until someone gets hurt.
Just waiting for some sunshine on a free day
No one needs to get hurt here, there is an exit
Col
It's like a car crash, you don't want to see it but when you know there is one coming you can't look away.No one forcing or exploiting you to open the link, are they
Canon 50D - Zuiko 28/2.8 50/1.8 100/2.8 - Tokina 11-16/2.8
No, I've admitted that nobody's presented any facts, evidence, or material that supports an alternative.Why? You've already admitted you have closed mind on the subject.
Oh well, if they get around to classifying everything at least we know that the politicians who we duly elected are well versed in the difference between art and porn.
AndrewNikon, Fuji, Nikkor, Sigma, Tamron, Tokina and too many other bits and pieces to list.
Threadstarter
Again you fail to answer my question.
I have specifically discounted the specific Henson case and asked what specific law should there be to prevent exploitation.
BTW Currently we have CP in two categories (<18 and aggravated 14) and a SA pollie being busted for CP on both counts. http://www.news.com.au/national/mp-a...-1226042484463
Yet there are those that argue that this should not even be a crime as in their view it is either art or a 'natural' expression.
When does it stop being art and come under 'exploitive' porn? Again, Where would you draw the line? be specific!
There are already laws that prevent exploitation, in ALL Australian jurisdictions.
The law already draws a line around what is considered CP. You just referred to it. No additional censorship or classification scheme is required.
Last edited by ElectricImages; 21-04-2011 at 12:46pm.
Is that YOUR answer, or the one you'd like us to accept as yours? The question was not where does the LAW draw the line but rather where would YOU draw the line! Come out of your anarchist bookshelf and fess up!!!
Last edited by WhoDo; 21-04-2011 at 6:20pm. Reason: type-O
Posting Permissions
