User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Correcting barrel distortion on K7 with a Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5 DC Macro Lens

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    16 Sep 2010
    Location
    Chadstone
    Posts
    88
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question Correcting barrel distortion on K7 with a Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5 DC Macro Lens

    My Sigma 17-70 F2.8-4.5 DC Macro is producing Barrel Distortion when attached to my K7 (not that I have another camera to chech it aganist)
    how do I correct it when the function is disabled for non pentax lenses on the K7?

    The Photo attach is take at the 17mm FL of a 10mm grid with the front of the lens sitting at the minimum focual lenght about 2000mm from the page, spirit leveled on a tripod....

    The second at 50mm FL
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by bdparker; 27-03-2011 at 4:37pm.
    Br Barry
    Flickr

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] + 18-55WR + 50-200WR + Sigma 17-70 F2.8-4.5 DC Macro
    Sigma APO 70-200 f2.8 EX DG OS HSM + Sigma EF-610 DG Super Flash

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    15 Dec 2009
    Location
    central west
    Posts
    933
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What program are you using? LR and PS have barrel distortion correction tho I tend to use LR.....
    cheers
    Jan

  3. #3
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    16 Sep 2010
    Location
    Chadstone
    Posts
    88
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Jan ... I have neither, I use Coral PaintShop Photo Pro X3 or the Pentax Software, I notice that both of these do have distortion correction.
    but i was hoping on doing it at the camera instead of having to correct almost every photo I take.
    Although PSPx3 does batch process, which isn't practical because the amount of distortion is relative to the focal length (so I have noticed in taking incremental shots).

  4. #4
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    27 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury North
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have you tried it anyway on the K7 as sometimes the Pentax manual can be misleading.
    Regards
    Kevin


    Nikon D500 D7200. nikkor 200-500 f5.6, Tamron 100-400, Nikkor 70-200 f4 plus other glass.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevpride/

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    15 Dec 2009
    Location
    central west
    Posts
    933
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hmmm I have a feeling that the distortion can only be reduced by reducing the zoom length. I have ditched pspx3 and moved to PS I am afraid. Never tried the pentax program.......I use LR to remove distortion from my 10mm lens as it has the correct profiles. It can be done manually but yes it is time consuming!. DXO is another program/plugin that will do it .....but not sure if it works with PSPx3..........sorry I cant be more help! Maybe someone else will chime in??
    cheers
    Jan

  6. #6
    Arch-Σigmoid Ausphotography Regular ameerat42's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Sep 2009
    Location
    Nthn Sydney
    Posts
    23,541
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    OK, and then how important is it to you? If critical, you may have to invest in something like Adobe PS. Check the wwweb out to see if Adobe Elements (which is cheaper than Photoshop) has the distortion correcting feature. I don't know if the free Picasa and Gimp have it. But note that I have Adobe CS2 and I have NOT used the barrel distortion feature since the early days, MUCH preferring the Edit-Transform-Warp feature instead.
    Am.
    Edit: typed b4 I read ricstew's reply.
    Last edited by ameerat42; 27-03-2011 at 9:06pm.
    CC, Image editing OK.

  7. #7
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    16 Sep 2010
    Location
    Chadstone
    Posts
    88
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ricstew View Post
    Hmmm I have a feeling that the distortion can only be reduced by reducing the zoom length.
    actually it is worse at the short end (17mm) and is barley visible for 50mm up

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •