I've taken so far more than 10,000 photos with my D7000 (which is better than the D300, IQ wise) and I can tell that in landscape and portraiture my D2X is still unbeatable at 100-200 ISO.
 |
  |
 |
Thanks useful information: 2
I've taken so far more than 10,000 photos with my D7000 (which is better than the D300, IQ wise) and I can tell that in landscape and portraiture my D2X is still unbeatable at 100-200 ISO.
Last edited by Sar NOP; 24-03-2011 at 11:31pm.
ill support you there Sar, in fact Id say its better at 400 also (D300's weakest spot)
Darren
Gear : Nikon Goodness
Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
Please support Precious Hearts
Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated
Threadstarter
Wow Sar that is impressive, great detail at 100 % crop. thanks again for providing examples, its nice to see real world shots.
Kiwi, to be honest there really is nothing wrong with the D60, it takes great shots and has been a fantastic companion. I've had it a few years now as it was greatlfully given to me by my dad when he upgraded to the D300. Before that i had a Mamiya film camera. ( and still do ). I find small things annoying such as only having 3 auto focus areas, especially with portraiture, and it would be nice to have a few more buttons to make it a little easier to navigate around the camera. In real world terms it is/was an entry level camera and would like to step up to a body more along the lines of "professional amateur", that comes with it some more features that i dont have at the moment.
Simon.
both these links were shot using a D2Xs....... at 320 ISO. I have had this camera since new and it still amazes me...... great and very hard to beat @ 100=200 ISO
http://www.ausphotography.net.au/for...-the-wild-side......
http://www.ausphotography.net.au/for...rf-fest-take-2
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
