User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  12
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 42 of 42

Thread: 16-35mm L or the 17-40mm L

  1. 31-03-2011, 3:38pm #41
    selaw
    selaw is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    06 Feb 2010
    Location
    Tumut
    Posts
    1,378
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just got my 17-40L today and I'm sure the test will be what I can do with it not what the lens is capable of. Can't wait to start playing

    Roy

    5D MkIII gripped; EF 17-40 f/4L; EF 24-105 f/4L; EF 50 f/1.8; EF 135 f/2L; 580EXII; Manfrotto 055XPROB & 308RC ballhead; Computrekker Plus AW
    My Photobucket / My flickr
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 31-03-2011, 8:22pm #42
    chriso145
    chriso145 is offline
    Member chriso145's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd go the 17-40, I really think the only benefit of the 16-35 is the extra stop...

    I don't think image quality is noticeably different between the two, and for the price difference definitely not..
    Chris Tippelt

    Nikon!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules