User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  2
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Canon 50mm 1.4 hexagonal bokeh

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    09 Mar 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    445
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Canon 50mm 1.4 hexagonal bokeh

    I've noticed when shooting at a big aperture with my 50mm 1.4, the bokeh comes out hexagonal...is this normal???


    Here is an example

    Cheers
    Emma

    Avoid shooting with a 12 gauge shotgun. Use a Canon instead.

    Canon 5D, Canon 7D, 50mm 1.4, 18-55mm, Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 VC, Sigma 70-200mm f2.8, 580EX Speedlight. Facebook

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    25 Jan 2010
    Location
    Cedar Grove
    Posts
    1,046
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Emma the bokeh is related to the shape of the aperture. When the aperture is wide open it is closest to round but as the aperture is made smaller (larger f number) the blades that form the opening make a more hexagonal shape - it depends on the number of blades in your shutter as to what exact shape you will get. The more shutter blades, the rounder the aperture.
    Cliff
    CC always appreciated
    gear: 7D, 400D, 17-55mm IS, 100mm Macro L IS, 70-300mm DO IS, EF 12II and EF 25II Extension Tubes, 580 EX II Speedlite, Printers - Pro9500 Mk II, MX396
    Tokina 11-16 f2.8, Tamron 18-270, Vanguard AltaPro 263AT Tripod with GH-100 Pistol Grip Ball Head, Benro C-058 Tripod and J-1 Ballhead, Velbon Ultrastick 50LX Monopod
    LR5, PS CC

  3. #3
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    09 Mar 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    445
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for your answer! Makes sense

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    06 Nov 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think it is octagonal rather hexagonal. It means that a 50mm 1.4f lens has 8 blades
    Be happy, life is beautiful, even through a humble point and shoot camera
    Flickr

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    25 Jan 2010
    Location
    Cedar Grove
    Posts
    1,046
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They're fairly easy to count. Just set camera to Av and aperture to about f8, remove lens cap, look into front of lens and press the DOF Preview button. You will see the aperture close down and you will be able to count the number of blades - or it may be easier to count the number of sides to the opening. If you can't see it at f8, try a different f number.
    Last edited by Cliff; 17-02-2011 at 1:11pm.

  6. #6
    Ausphotography Regular Bercy's Avatar
    Join Date
    05 Nov 2009
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    1,556
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Canon 50mm F1.4 has 8 blades and the F1.8 has 5 blades. Quite easy to see in teh bokeh. The question is do you like it!
    Berni

    ""The most important piece of camera equipment you will ever own sits between your ears...."

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    08 Oct 2010
    Location
    Greenwich
    Posts
    1,708
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know that all the Canon DO leneses have hexagonal bokeh, but didn't realise that their normal lenses cando this too.
    I've never experienced this with any of my Canon or sigma lenses.
    Mind you, I don't have a 50mm F1.4, but my nift fifty seems to have nicer bokeh than this.
    All my photos are taken with recycled pixels.
    Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit.
    Wisdom, is knowing not to serve it in a fruit salad.

  8. #8
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    09 Mar 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    445
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I didnt have a problem with it until someone mentioned it to me and now its all I see :/

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    24 Jan 2011
    Location
    Wangaratta
    Posts
    64
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The sigma 50mm 1.4 has 9 blades. Also some lenses have curved blades.
    Canon EOS 40D - Canon EFS 17-85mm f4-5.6 - Canon Macro EF 50mm f2.5
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/thurston86/

  10. #10
    A royal pain in the bum! arthurking83's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jun 2006
    Location
    the worst house, in the best street
    Posts
    8,186
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    f/3.5 is not normally considered to be a 'big aperture' when the lens in question is an f/1.4 type.

    Big apertures, I suppose values up to about f/2.8 would be considered big, beyond that you'll get middle sized and then at about f/5.6 and smaller would be considered small(as the lens most likely stops down to f/16).

    you'll see these aperture shaped bokeh circles in your images, dependent on the focus distance and the respective distances of the elements in the scene.
    so: if you focus on a subject nearer to the camera, the blur circles will be less defined and larger in the background. Also, if you focused at the same distance that you had as in this image and the elements in the frame that produced the octagonal highlights were closer than they were in this scene, they'd also look larger and less defined too. (not as much as if focusing closer tho, as focused distance plays a larger role in the rendering quality of bokeh.

    Is it normal?.. yep!

    FWIW, at large apertures, that is f/2 and larger, you most likely won't see the aperture blades forming any shapes like this. They're likely to be more rounded, and usually with more colour fringing too.
    Nikon D800E, D300, D70s
    {Nikon} -> 50/1.2 : 500/8(CPU'd) : 105/2.8VR Micro : 180/2.8ais : 105mm f/1.8ais : 24mm/2ais
    {Sigma}; ->10-20/4-5.6 : 50/1.4 : 12-24/4.5-5.6II : 150-600mm|S
    {Tamron}; -> 17-50/2.8 : 28-75/2.8 : 70-200/2.8 : 300/2.8 SP MF : 24-70/2.8VC


  11. #11
    Site Rules Breach - Permanent Ban Tatts's Avatar
    Join Date
    05 Jan 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    105
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There is a comparison between the Sigma and the Canon here

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •