User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Portrait lens

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    29 Sep 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    74
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Portrait lens

    Hello everyone,

    I am just about to buy my next lens and would like something that I could shoot portraits with, mostly of my son, family and friends. I have a 450D and not looking to upgrade in the near future.

    I already own a 100mm f/2.8 macro lens which produces some wonderful quality portraits but I often find, I have to stand too far away. So I was thinking either the 50mm f/1.4 or 35mm f/2.0? My budget is around $500.

    Any guidance gratefully received!

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    05 May 2010
    Location
    Launceston
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey rbat....

    I have a 500D & my brother a 450D....and he has a 50mm (f1.8) prime lens, commonly called the 'nifty fifty'. I have used this lens for both portrait pics & some landscape stuff & find that for the $$$ it performs really well. Whether it's being used for shutter speeds slower than normal or in bright conditions, i found it a very good piece of equipment.

    If you'd like, i could dig up a couple of pics tonight & post for you....

    Also...attached link to dpreview.....

    http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/...50_1p8_ii_c16/

    Regards,
    Thoma
    Last edited by Thoma; 14-02-2011 at 11:25am.

  3. #3
    Member Adrian Fischer's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Aug 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    640
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    +1 for the nifty fifty.
    ______________________________________________

    Adrian Fischer
    Brisbane, Australia

    Gear: Nikon D80, D300, Nikon 35mm f1.8, 50mm f1.8, 85mm f1.8, 105mm f2.5, 18-200 VR, 70-200 VR, Sigma 28-70mm f2.8, Sigma 50-500, Tonkina 12-24 f4, SB-600, various YongNuo Strobes, various umbrellas, 6 x 300w studio flashes, various softboxes, reflectors, stands, transmitters and receivers.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    31 Jan 2010
    Location
    North East
    Posts
    312
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rbat View Post
    I was thinking either the 50mm f/1.4 or 35mm f/2.0?
    The 50/1.4 is probably better regarded generally than the 35/2.0 and is more the kind of focal length, on a crop body at least, that is commonly used for portraiture. The 35 would be considered a bit wide to be a good portrait lens by many people, though I use a 50/1.4 on a full frame camera (the same as using a 35 on a crop body) and I find it fine for portraits. If you're not quite sure of what you need, the 50 would be a safer bet and it's quite a good lens.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    217
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a 450D and have found the "Nifty Fifty" to be quite good.
    Canon 450D with kit lenses 15-55mm and 55-250mm.
    Beginner wanting to improve.
    Thanks for taking the time to review my photo's any constructive comments appreciated.

  6. #6
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    29 Sep 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    74
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    soulman, I was particularly concerned about the crop body and distance of the 50mm. It sounds like others are using the 50mm with no issue though which is helpful to know.

    Thoma, I would love to see your photos if you have time to post them, thanks.

  7. #7
    Site Rules Breach - Permanent Ban
    Join Date
    09 May 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    147
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Your macro is probably a better portrait lens than all others mentioned though

    Keep in mind when you are closer, your perspective will change, and you will get a more cluttered background too with the shorter focal lengths.

  8. #8
    Account Closed
    Join Date
    10 Aug 2008
    Location
    Lake Macquarie
    Posts
    1,413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    nifty fifty.......

  9. #9
    Ausphotography Site Sponsor/Advertiser DAdeGroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    26 Feb 2009
    Location
    Cedar Creek, Qld, Australia
    Posts
    1,890
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rbat View Post
    soulman, I was particularly concerned about the crop body and distance of the 50mm. It sounds like others are using the 50mm with no issue though which is helpful to know.

    Thoma, I would love to see your photos if you have time to post them, thanks.
    The 50/1.8 isn't a bad lens on a crop body for portraits (equiv field of view to an 80mm lens on full frame which is definitely in the portrait lens territory). However, optically it does not act like an 80mm lens. Compression is much less and distortion greater.

    Anyway, here's some (rather old) samples I shot (mostly on a 400D) from when the 50/1.8 was my primary lens.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dadegro...7606531339075/
    Dave

    http://www.degrootphotography.com.au/
    Canon EOS 1D MkIV | Canon EOS 5D MkII | Canon EOS 30D | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM | Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM | Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L & some non-L lenses.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    14 Aug 2009
    Location
    Abbotsbury
    Posts
    165
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Started with the 50 1.8 and went to the 50 1.4. Love that damn lens .
    AKA Sean

    Canon 5D MKII - 24-105L - 70-200 F4L IS - 70-300 IS USM - 28 1.8 - 35L 1.4 - 50 1.4 - 85 1.8 - 100L Macro - 200L 2.8II - Tamron 17-35 2.8 - Sigma 150-500 - 430EX - and a stack of other bits and pieces.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    05 May 2010
    Location
    Launceston
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry mate....forgot to tick 'notify me'...

    Shall dig up some tonight.

    My brother doesn't have any issues on his 450D with this lens....lovely shallow DOF wide open.

    Thoma

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    05 May 2010
    Location
    Launceston
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Nifty Pics

    Hey rbat...

    Here's the pics....

    Details are:

    Pic 1: 1/30 S/S @ f3.2
    Pic 2: 2.5 sec S/S @f16
    Pic 3: 6 sec S/S @ f22
    Pic 4: 1.6 sec S/S @ f22

    As you can see, the nifty is at home at both ends of the scale.....

    Any questions, fire away...!!!!!!

    PS. sorry this took so long.

    Thoma
    Attached Images Attached Images

  13. #13
    Ausphotography Regular Bercy's Avatar
    Join Date
    05 Nov 2009
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    1,491
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I find most professional portraits are done with mild telephoto - a la what you already have. Once you are doing head and shoulders and head to foot shots, then I think the 50mm 1.8 or 1.4 would be great. I have a 1.4mm and found its optics very good...now if I can only find out where I put the lens.
    Berni

  14. #14
    New Member
    Join Date
    20 Jun 2006
    Location
    **Suburb/Town Required**
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the 50 1.4 is nice, not sure about the 35. but have you thought about the 85 1.8, I know it is close to the 100mm range, but is a nice lens and really good for portraits.
    Word of the day
    Flickr
    http://nob.au.com
    Canon 5d, Canon 20d, Canon 30d, and a whole lotta Canon glass
    For Geeky Tshirts check out
    http://www.gtee.com.au

  15. #15
    Member raylene's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 May 2010
    Location
    Rosedale
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i loved my 50 1.8

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    25 May 2010
    Location
    Armidale
    Posts
    444
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a 50 f1.4 canon and have used a 50 f1.2 (which is about 4 times the price) to do portraits. The difference is almost undetectable. the 1.2 is a bit better in low light (I'm talking dusk to a bit later). I think the 1.4 cost me around $600 a couple of years ago. Its a very versatile lens and takes magnificent portrait shots. For someone getting into it I would definitely recommend a 1.4

  17. #17
    Member 8perpetual's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Dec 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For full body/half body shots, i would go with the 35 f/2. It's a great lens. I use it on full-frame and am very satisfied for the amount I paid, which is a fraction of the L glass. If you're mainly shooting head shots, then go for the 50mm... the 50mm 1.4 is better than the nifty fifty for its AF but the nifty fifty is really a bargain for its amazing sharpness... haha just remember, you pay for what you get
    Great moments, Good light.
    8 Perpetual Photography
    Flickr

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    27 Sep 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    with the budget, I'll go for 50mm 1.4 mate..
    jrgdesign.com
    ______
    :: Canon 7D + BG-E7 :: Canon 50D + BG-E2N ::

  19. #19
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    29 Sep 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    74
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thoma, love the nature shots. The water looks amazing. I have pretty much decided on the 50mm f/1.4 as my portrait lens. The nifty fifty is brilliant for the price but I think the 1.4 will suit my needs better.

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    08 Sep 2010
    Location
    Syd
    Posts
    259
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    as has been said, the 50mm f/1.4 is a good lens.
    It's not a huge improvement over the 1.8 though IMO. The 1.8 really is good value.
    I've have both and would say simply buy which ever one you can afford. As you have $500 to spend, might as well go the 1.4
    Though it may be worth considering the sigma 50mm f/1.4, it's a little bigger and heavier but has certain advantages.

    Some shots taken with the canon 50mm f/1.4



    Last edited by pmack; 06-03-2011 at 9:13pm.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •