User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: K5? Nope... K-r is the go :)

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    22 Sep 2008
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    83
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Wink K5? Nope... K-r is the go :)

    Reposted some of my initial from my PF thread:
    -----
    K-5 is completely off my future agenda now, I had to think long and hard about what I really wanted.

    1) 16MP? not really... I was happy with 10, and 12 will be just fine for my purposes.
    2) Top LCD?... nice to have but I am simply going to have to get over it.
    3) Weather sealed body?... again, nice to have, but my reality is that I am mostly a fair weather shooter and none of my lenses are sealed or even WR so... ha.
    4) ISO to 52000? I don't really care much about that, I rarely shoot over 400 and most of the time choose to restrict to 200 and truly... I'm pretty sure that the K-r range will be MORE than adequate for me, with the ISO I do regularly use being better than ever.

    What have I achieved in buying the K-r instead?
    1) Lighter weight: The K200 is pretty hefty (though not as hefty as some) and when I was considering the K-5 I was forgetting how difficult I find even the K200 at times, because of my carpal tunnels, osteoarthritis and so on. Getting an even heavier camera made no sense.
    2) Live view: I've managed without LV on the K200d but I find it a royal pain, using a tripod without live view. Yes, we all managed in the past with our film cameras but why continue to play like that when you don't have to. Will be very useful for macro too.
    3) Focus lights: lack of these was one of the things that annoyed me about the K-x – the issue has been addressed now, and this is good.
    4) Much faster AF than my K200: all good.
    ----
    That was last week. I hadn't got out much until last night, but had a short opportunity after dinner with a friend, I had taken the camera just in case. You know how it is

    I would have liked to be a tad earlier and in a slightly different location. I was using the K-r with the DA35Ltd.


    ISO 200, f/4.5, 1/200
    Did some post processing to lighten the buildings... everything in foreground is black in the original.


    ISO 800, f/2.8, 1/60


    ISO 3200, f/7.1, 1/13

    I'm amazed at how well the dark scenes render with little noise. Yes, there's still some there, you'd not expect to get away with none, but so much better than my poor old K200D.

    After these few shots, I'm feeling very comfortable with the K-r already, its an excellent bit of kit, and I cannot see it meeting the same fate as the K-x I bought early in 2010 (onsold in under 6 months). It feels like a fairly significant upgrade from that, and from the K200D. No regrets about not getting a K5
    Blog : PPG : Flickr
    PENTAX K-5 + various lenses; Olympus XZ-1; Fujifilm X100; Ricoh GRD3

  2. #2
    keen learner of new tricks.
    Join Date
    09 Feb 2009
    Location
    Newcastle, NSW
    Posts
    8,372
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hey there. Glad that you are really happy with your gear. Plenty to shoot around Newy. Love the fountain shot the best and would love to see it at a much slower shutter speed. Might have a go at that myself after I get the nd400..soon. 2 doesnt do much for me but 1 is nice and I reckon I`d crop half the sky out probably between the two dark cloud areas on the left. Thats my .02`s worth.
    Graeme
    "May the good Lord look down and smile upon your face"......Norman Gunston___________________________________________________
    Nikon: D7000, D80, 12-24 f4, 17-55 f2.8, 18-135, 70-300VR, 35f2, SB 400, SB 600, TC-201 2x converter. Tamron: 90 macro 2.8 Kenko ext. tubes. Photoshop CS2.


  3. #3
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    22 Sep 2008
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    83
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hey old dog... Thanks for the C&C... I was really only trying it out, not for any other reason than to see how it would perform under trying conditions. I would do the fountain again with a tripod (didn't last night because there were a bunch of drunken fools hootin' and hollerin' nearby), and I wouldn't shoot in the carpark at all <g>. Don't have an ND400 but REALLY want one, so many uses for it...

    I just didn't have time to get over to Warners Bay or Belmont (was having dinner at SJs and didnt finish til almost 8pm) but might wander over tonight to see if there's anything worth shooting... last night would have been gorgeous, about 5-10 minutes earlier.

  4. #4
    It's all about the Light!
    Tech Admin
    Kym's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Jun 2008
    Location
    Modbury, Adelaide
    Posts
    9,640
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    K-x or K-r are good cameras, and brilliant for the price.

    If $$ was available from a tree I'd have a 645D.
    regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
    Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff



  5. #5
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    22 Sep 2008
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    83
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My Mum always said that I behaved as if there was a moneytree at the bottom of the garden. I haven't changed in all these years. I reckon...can't take it with you. I'd get one too, but its a monster. I'd need a trolley.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    15 Nov 2010
    Location
    Brunswick, Melbourne
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good list. Really the only thing that I would have like on my recent travels was weather sealing, but as you point out that would require WR lenses to be useful which would be restrictive. Rather spend the extra money on another lens or two methinks. The light weight of the K-r, even with the 100-300, makes it a dream for travel.

    I'm finding myself limiting auto ISO to 3200 in poorer light. Generally at 3200 the noise is there but clean enough not to take away from the image without anything other than in-camera noise reduction. At 6400 the images are definitely usable after the Noise Ninja treatment. Obviously at this end of the spectrum we're not talking super sharp, but for travel/street that's not always the primary concern.
    Last edited by davidbrewster; 22-01-2011 at 10:15pm. Reason: additional comment

  7. #7
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    22 Sep 2008
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    83
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by davidbrewster View Post
    Good list. Really the only thing that I would have like on my recent travels was weather sealing, but as you point out that would require WR lenses to be useful which would be restrictive. Rather spend the extra money on another lens or two methinks. The light weight of the K-r, even with the 100-300, makes it a dream for travel.

    I'm finding myself limiting auto ISO to 3200 in poorer light. Generally at 3200 the noise is there but clean enough not to take away from the image without anything other than in-camera noise reduction. At 6400 the images are definitely usable after the Noise Ninja treatment. Obviously at this end of the spectrum we're not talking super sharp, but for travel/street that's not always the primary concern.
    re lenses: agreed!! I have a DA15mm on the way from B&H and have plans to acquire all three pancakes. Probably begin with the 70, then 40 then 21.

    ISO: yep, I did that last at 3200 just to see how it would go. I'll probably restrict mine to way less, but am looking forward to almost noiseless shots by comparison with my K200d and any/all compacts.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    24 Jan 2010
    Location
    Southern Tablelands
    Posts
    89
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nice to hear some hype away from the K5. ...well that and the moaning about the first batch stained sensors.

    I was THIS close to upgrading the K20 to the K-r.....still on the cards, but my thoughts are now between upgrading my dSLR or trading it all in for a Leica RF.

    BTW: DA35 is a great lens and you've flexed its muscle very nicely here.
    Shoot More, Edit Less
    Flickrriver

  9. #9
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    22 Sep 2008
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    83
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As you probably all know, I have now bought a K5 as well as that 15mm (which I love) and an FA43 which I ended up choosing over the DA40, for its f/1.9. Its now become my "always on the camera" lens. However, when I bought K5, I didnt get the kit, just the body, and as the weather turned foul in Newie over the past day or three (that is, always threatening rain but rarely actually delivering) I decided that having WR lenses was de rigeur. So I bought the 18-55 and the 50-200. Yes, I know the 18-135 might have been a better choice but B&H had the others dead cheap and I think once we are having foul weather, it probably won't matter that much. I've avoided going out in stormy weatehr because of the lack of WR lenses. Now, I won't have an excuse (and will enjoy it!).

    As some of you know, I've put the K-r up for sale, but TBH I won't mind at all if it doesn't sell because there are bound to be times when I just want a small and light cam with me, and that will be perfect. And, its a brilliant bit of kit. I still think its one of the best out there.


    Taken with the K-r and the DA15mm (6 seconds, f/11 and ISO100)
    Last edited by kyteflyer; 07-03-2011 at 5:58pm.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •