EOS 5D Mark II

[JM Tran]

Yes, my screen is calibrated, if what you mean are a kind of "graininess" in your example, then I think it's so small in this example not to be an issue. Have you tried doing prints from these examples and see how they come out?

that sort of graininess doesnt exist when I print out to my usual size for clients, which is 45x30 inch - quite a large size. That 'graininess' shown above seems to come from tiny crops which are more than 100% or so - other cameras might seem smoother - but it also means they dont retain details like the 5D2 can or did above.

this is just pixel-peeping to me, printing results will always be better than on screen.

[dood]

This site http://www.canonrumors.com/category/...n-5d-mark-iii/ seems to be close to the pulse. Predictions are 2nd half of 2011.

My 2c worth: the 5D was out for 4 years before the Mark II came out. The Mark II has been out for only 2 years.

[pollen]

that sort of graininess doesnt exist when I print out to my usual size for clients, which is 45x30 inch - quite a large size. That 'graininess' shown above seems to come from tiny crops which are more than 100% or so - other cameras might seem smoother - but it also means they dont retain details like the 5D2 can or did above.

this is just pixel-peeping to me, printing results will always be better than on screen.

Actually as stated they are less than 100%, as the 100% crop is >1024 pixels wide and I had to use a 800px downsized version to display on this forum.

As stated, the actual 100% crops are even worse, whereas these are more like 75% crops

Most of my clientele are modern consumers and want digital images nowadays. They appear on digital images.

I don't think I've ever printed an image other than to give to my grandma because she doesn't have a computer.

My point is different people have different needs. Whilst this may not be an issue for you it definitely is for me.

[Clubmanmc]

my suggestion would be to come out one night and try them

I have a 7D and a 5D II i am sure a few people here would be able to help you with 60D and others, i have a swag of lenses, and would be happy to let you have a little go...

I am in Adleaide doing the brighton jetty classic in Feb, and am there for a few days, would be happy to help out...

as an all rounder, (unless you specifically want to go to full frame) then a 7D is a really good compromise, and has a great focusing system... (about on par with my 1dII) but the 5D III may inherit this system!

M

[OutCast]

I'd make sure you put nice glass on it ... bodies fade - glass (well treated) stays with you for a long time.

[sniper1969]

I've just taken the plunge today and purchased a new 5D MkII.
Can't wait tfor the battery to charge, so I can get out there and try it out!

[petercee]

Here's a thought:
much of this thread is devoted to skill level and your pics being critiqued on this forum and others... but you asked if buying the 5D MkII would be a good move. I say go for it and ignore the two issues in the previous sentence. It's Canon's most affordable camera with the least limitations. And expressing yourself carries no onus to impress others, least of all forum critics.
Disclaimer: if your raison d'etre is to gain the approval of forum members, flickr, etc, ignore my entire reply.

[kiwi]

@pollen, thanks for the examples and info, did a bit of research on the problem and though it exists, I have not had much of an issue with it. I normally expose to the highlights and try to keep the shadows as bright as possible, reducing the exposure in the shadows in processing therefore reducing the apparent issue. Did a couple of tests and it mainly seems to occur at -3 stops. it was interesting to see the comparisons between the high end Nikons and the 5D2, Nikon definitely have a much nicer image result. Would love to try them side by side in a real comparison, Kiwi, you up for a small experiment?

However, even after the research today, there is no way I'd give it away, it produces some exceptional results and as long as you shoot to it's strengths, and honestly, I don't see low light shooting being a weakness.

Sure, as long as everyone keeps their clothes on and I dont have to touch that filthy Canon of yours

[Xenedis]

much of this thread is devoted to skill level and your pics being critiqued on this forum and others...

That's fair enough, IMO.

I don't know how capable is the OP, but when someone is asking about a camera such as the 5D Mark II, which is not an entry-level camera in terms of intended use or price, it's fair enough to try to ascertain the skill level of the potential user.

you asked if buying the 5D MkII would be a good move. I say go for it and ignore the two issues in the previous sentence.

It is to be remembered that buying a camera of this calibre is not going to turn someone's photos into masterpieces, any more than buying a $120,000 sports car is going to turn a new driver into Michael Schumacher.

Note that this is a general comment, and is not in reference to the OP.

IMO, it is foolish and potentially expensive to ignore one's capability when considering equipment. Again, buying a very good camera doesn't mean a thing when it comes to ability.

It's Canon's most affordable camera with the least limitations.

The term 'most affordable' isn't one I would associate with this camera.

[JM Tran]

The term 'most affordable' isn't one I would associate with this camera.

hahaha it definitely isnt the most affordable, and it also has a lot of limitations too

[Xenedis]

hahaha it definitely isnt the most affordable, and it also has a lot of limitations too

If you want a fast frame rate or increased AF points and AF accuracy, the 1-series is the go.

I shoot 'scapes, portraits and still-life mostly, so it's an ideal camera for those applications. I haven't otherwise found the 5D Mark II to be limiting.

[JM Tran]

If you want a fast frame rate or increased AF points and AF accuracy, the 1-series is the go.

I shoot 'scapes, portraits and still-life mostly, so it's an ideal camera for those applications. I haven't otherwise found the 5D Mark II to be limiting.

I do everything you do already and more with it in terms of genres mainly for work and some fun. The DR is not as great as its closest rival the D700 which I also use, and also for noise control too. Its more than just about the AF speed and FPS, which never bothered me as much as the aforementioned.

[Camerashy]

Just to add for those still thinking about FF that I bought a 5D Mk2 kit with 24-105 lens this week in Sydney for $3,350 with 1yr Canon Australia warranty (ie not grey), so it seems that for those with the desire and the dollars there has never been a better time to go FF.

[sniper1969]

Just to add for those still thinking about FF that I bought a 5D Mk2 kit with 24-105 lens this week in Sydney for $3,350 with 1yr Canon Australia warranty (ie not grey), so it seems that for those with the desire and the dollars there has never been a better time to go FF.

Sounds like there are some good deals out there at the moment.
I got mine (body only) with genuine Canon battery and genuine 3yr extended warranty for $2740.
Loving the new kit!

[Smithyworld]

Great Camera, go for it.