Has anyone got one or tried one and whats the thoughts is it worth the $1500 or would you go the 28-300 3.5-5.6 @ $1000 ??
Has anyone got one or tried one and whats the thoughts is it worth the $1500 or would you go the 28-300 3.5-5.6 @ $1000 ??
It's difficult to help you if we don't know if you are shooting FX or DX etc.
If you shoot DX you will get a coverage equivalent to 50mm - 210mm in FX terms.
I think the 28 - 300 may be more versatile.
Cheers
Darey
Nikon user, Thick skinned and wanting to improve, genuine C & C welcomed.
Photographs don't lie ! - Anonymous Liar
Delete - accidental repeat message.
Last edited by Darey; 18-11-2010 at 9:43pm.
Darey
Nikon D700 and waiting patiently for an upgrade trvelling overseas early next year 6wks total round europe and trying to lighten the load taking lowepro aw 400 nikon 14-24 f2.8
70 -200 f2.8 ??? 50mm f1.4 SB900 have 24-70 f2.8 also but it is starting to get a bit weighty wondering if 28-300 is any good and will it replace the 24-70 and 70-200 or will i regret not taking the full kit. Gets heavy after days walking 5 kids and wife in tow by the way.???
Probably the wrong person to comment on this but I actually have a D60 with the 24-120 f3.5-5.6G IF ED, not sure if this is the same lens you are after but I think its a brilliant piece of glass, only piece of Nikon gear I have and every bit as good as my Canon equipment
Richard
I've been wrong before!! Happy to have constructive criticism though.Gear used Canon 50D, 7D & 5DMkII plus expensive things hanging off their fronts and of course a "nifty fifty".