DigitalRev - My photos, my story™
an interesting comparison though I'm sure people might be watching the video for other reasons ........
because the comparison was made, I'm curious, does anyone really shoot at 12800 iso other than just for testing?
Call me Dylan! www.everlookphotography.com | www.everlookphotography.wordpress.com | www.flickr.com/photos/dmtoh
Canon EOS 5dmk3 : 17-40 F4 L, 70-200F2.8 canon L, 24-70mm canon L, Gitzo Safari +1178 ballhead. |Canon 5dmkII, 16-35mmF2.8 II L, Gitzo 2541 )
Singh Ray/Hitech/Lee assorted filters, Z pro modified system Cokin holder
Post : Lightroom 3.6 catalogue -> Export as 16bit TIFF, Edited CS5 -> resized for web.
thanks for the answer - I'm still afraid to go that high I confess!
And the answer is .... The K-5 !! Faster frame rate, higher top end ISO (51,200) etc.
regards, Kym Gallery Honest & Direct Constructive Critique Appreciated! ©
Digital & film, Bits of glass covering 10mm to 500mm, and other stuff
Just for you Kym:
7D and D7000 aren't really in the same class
or price range
There's a bit too much focus on video in today's photographer tho I think.
Interesting comment about the levels.
I wonder if there is a site to know for each Nikon the corresponding Canon that we can compare with.
Constructive Criticism (CC) is alsways welcome.
Photography gear: Nikon D7000;Nikkor 18-105mm; Nikkor 50mm f/1.8; Tamron 70-300mm A17; Nikon AW100 ;Canon EOS 300; Tamron 28-105mm; Canon 75-300mm.
Photo Editing: ViewNX 2; sometimes Capture NX-D; GIMP 2.6 ;
Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/arguelloflores/ & http://500px.com/ArguelloFloresCollection
Pentax has had a long drought since being able to have some bragging rights - 2010 with the 645D and the K-5 is definitely a big year for Pentax.
Even over on POTN there is a bit of chat about the K-5 have more DR than the 1DIV and 5DII. A lot of of WT? and amazement.
Having shot Pentax since the 70's its all a bit of fun.
I'll add to that, Just because it has a Nikon or Canon badge on it doesn't mean it's a better performer.....
Here is an interesting site which compares cameras :
I don't know how accurate it is but have fun then get out and shoot photographs.
Nikon user, Thick skinned and wanting to improve, genuine C & C welcomed.
Photographs don't lie ! - Anonymous Liar
I wouldnt even bother or dare shooting above 6400ISO on any APSC sensor for any type of work unless its a little photo in a newspaper. Only for fun and personal use.
Ok, this is a thread I read with great interest only to finish as blind as when I started.
20yrs ago I owned a Pentax K1000 and a Minolta 7000Dynax (still own and they still work).
Today I own a Canon G12.
If I want to take the plunge and purchase a dslr that will bring me happiness for the next 10-20 yrs what would I go for?
Nikon d7000? Canon d7? Pentax k5?
It's not easy to make a decision, hence the reason for reading these threads.
I love macro, scenery shots and the odd portrait.
Which way to go?
I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?a3p4fi
Also, you are buying into a system, so if you plam to expand and really delve into photography, you will want to make sure that system has what you require in order to get into it.
My PBase site: http://www.pbase.com/lance_b