Would to know what people think of this lens, I can't afford the IS model so this is next best.
Very open question.
I know you say you can't afford the IS version but can you afford not to get it?
I bought this earlier this year and to date, whilst not yet having used it for what I bought it for, it is spectacular.
Nice and sharp. Heavy to hand hold.
This is one I got yesterday with no PP at all.
My main interest is Kite Surfing so looking for speed. Thus the 2.8. But IS is useless, thus the non IS.
Some of my photo's are at www.peterking.id.au
Non IS is a beautiful lens - trouble is I can't afford that one either!!
I think the 70-200 F4 IS is similarly priced (last time I looked) as the non IS 2.8.
If I was shooting outdoor only and did not need to use that extra couple of stops of light or shallow the depth of field that little bit more I'd go for the F4. If you would use it indoors or needed to use that narrow DOF, the 2.8 is the easy winner. I wouldn't be tempted by the 2.8 IS itself personally.
The only thing you get from looking back is a sore neck...
don't forget the 2.8 is only one stop more than the f/4
and the IS will give you at LEAST an extra stop in terms of a steady shot.
so if it's handheld speed you need, the IS will be better, but if it's action you are trying to freeze, the 2.8 will be better
Thank you all for your comments, I am picking up the lens this afternoon.
Graeme, Which lens did you settle on, I'm currently in the same boat. ?????
They call me "Blue" it's a red head thing.
"My Flickr Site"
Canon Bodies - 1DMk2N + 50D - Lenses - 17-35mm F2.8 L - 24-70mm F2.8 L - 70-200mm F2.8 L - 300mm F4 IS L - Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 - Sigma 10-20mm
" I Never get tired of looking at our diverse country, even if its through the lens of someone else".
CC is always appreciated.
Roosta i went with the 70-200 non IS lens, the images i'm getting are great.
I was in the same situation a few months ago. I'd had my eye on a 70-200 f2.8 IS and had been watching the prices, then along came the Version II and the price increase completely blew it out of my budget. On careful consideration I purchased a 70-200 f4 IS and am completely happy with the IQ and performance.
i have one and agree with the comments here it almost never leaves my camera!
Canon 450D, 7D, 17-40mm f/4L, 70-200mm f/2.8L, 50mm f/1.8, 430EXII
I would opt for an f4 IS instead if your budget is limited. It all depends of what you want to shoot, but the IS is a must for handheld
I have owned 5 versions of the Canon 70-200 series. The 2.8 non IS is a stellar, world class lens. Grab it if you can afford it as the 2.8 aperture gives you that extra something, especially in portraits.
id agree, my 70-200 2.8 non IS is a fantastic unit, is a great all rounder...
and if you need IS then you need a tripod...
www.pbase.com/mcphotographics loooots of pictures!
hmmm Eq list... 1D II, 5D II, 7D, 100-400 LIS F4.5-5.6, 70-200 F2.8L, 135 F2, 85 F1.8, 24-70 F2.8L, 16-35 F2.8L, 420EX, 580EX II x2 ST-E2 Cir polar filters and much much more all in a neat back pack that kills my back!
Week 16 Sheep Winner
If you have a question about car / action / sports photography or Canon Cameras PM me...
To all the experts,
plz plz help me deciding which one to choose "EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L USM" IS or Non IS? or "EF 70-200mm f/2.0 L USM". These three fit my budget,
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM Lens +3Yr Wty--AAJ5--- AU $1,401.01 @ebay ( -AU)
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 F4.0 L USM Lens+ 7Yr Int Wty-AAAF --- AU $758.16 @ebay ( -AU)
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 F4.0 L IS USM Lens+ 3Yr Int Wty-AAAF --- AU $1,289.29 @ebay ( -AU)
Here is the link -- > http://stores.ebay.com.au/DigitalRev...&_sid=16435525
should i go for F/2.8 L (non IS) over F/4L IS or F/4L IS or non IS version.
I am a noob and i have never used a DSLR before planning to buy a Canon EOS 7D. Theoretically i have some basic knowledge about the lens terminology but i need hands on review on the above mentioned lenses.
As in i know what "IS" is and what aperture size means.... what i want to know... how it will effect the quality of an image and how huge is the difference? when it comes to IS vs Non IS & 2.8 VS 4.0
Thanks in advance.
Honest CC whether good or bad, is much appreciated.
Love and enjoy photography, but won't be giving up my day job.