 |
  |
 |
Thanks useful information: 0
It's not that I cant make up my mind, it's just there are to many choices.
I'm now thinking insted of getting the 50 - 200SWD, I will get the Oly 14 -54mm F2.8-3.5 and the 70 - 300mm F4. Any feedback on the 14-54 F2.8 would be great, situations used low light, landscapes and so on.
Coupled to the E-30 (which I think I will get soon) but for the time being to my trusty E-330.
So any feed back would be great.
Anthony.
They call me "Blue" it's a red head thing.
"My Flickr Site"
Canon Bodies - 1DMk2N + 50D - Lenses - 17-35mm F2.8 L - 24-70mm F2.8 L - 70-200mm F2.8 L - 300mm F4 IS L - Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 - Sigma 10-20mm - DJI Mavic Pro Platinum
" I Never get tired of looking at our diverse country, even if its through the lens of someone else".
CC is always appreciated.
What are you interested in photographing? This will dictate what kind of lens would suit best.
Threadstarter
Pretty much what I mentioned, but always trying different things, so I guess I would like the best of both worlds, hard to cover that. Landscape with 14-54 and my sons rugby and what ever else with the 70 - 300.Originally Posted by piXelatedEmpire
Despite the price and size difference btw the 70-300 and the 50 -200 ( I have both, the 70-3000mostly stays at home unless I take the dogs with me then two dogs and the 50-200 area bit of a handful). The 50-200 is a far superior lens. I use it on an e620, mostly on a tripod but it shoots well handheld. The 70-300 hunts too much for my liking which means you miss some shots. As Adam says it is about what you shoot.
Graeme
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Add To Bookmarks