User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39

Thread: Canon 60D / 8-15mm fish eye / SuperTele mk2s

  1. #21
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    12 Aug 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Doubt it. Might even drag up the price as people have nothing to look foward too from the 60D in terms of a semipro AF sports camera

    Quote Originally Posted by jeffde View Post
    Question will this effect the price of a 7D its been slowly dropping ???

  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    08 Dec 2009
    Location
    Macleay Island
    Posts
    1,639
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looks like Canon may have fired a " Blank ".




    sorry

  3. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    29 Jul 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    733
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wonder if it is signalling the end of the xxxD series?

    Position the 60D as better camera than the 550D (by just a little bit) and a good margin over the 1000D.

    Might a few of the older Super telephotos coming onto the second hand market in the new year or so as.
    Greg
    1DmkIV + other stuff that sticks to the front. | Photogallery
    Clearly I'm cleverly disguised as a Responsible Adult.

  4. #24
    Member hus's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Dec 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    313
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by joele View Post
    So the 40d -> 50d was an upgrade when you factor in better LCD and software upgrades, though a rather small one (better but not much reason to upgrade if you already have a 40d)
    Also the main selling point that made me upgrade to the 50D is the micro adjustment that can be applied to each lens.
    As for video I really dont see the purpose of having video on a DSLR camera, for that purpose i have a vid cam. In my opinion the Canon 50D will hold its value and sort after model because it's the peak of the semi pro line.
    But thats my opinion
    The fastest way to a man's heart is through his chest with a sharp knife
    Canon 50D,
    Tamron 70-200 f/2.8, A very bright light, EF 50 f1.8, Tamron 17-50 f2.8

  5. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    28 Aug 2008
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    1,905
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Im really glad the 50D went away, was more happy with the 20D and 30D than both the 40 and 50D, especially the latter! I dont care what ppl say, poor noise control and poor shadows made it from a back up camera in the car, to it being an emergency camera for me which I leave at home.

  6. #26
    Site Rules Breach - Permanent Ban
    Join Date
    16 Mar 2009
    Location
    South Coast
    Posts
    2,610
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  7. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Nov 2008
    Location
    Mundaring
    Posts
    1,688
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    WOW, the telephoto's got me really excited. For what seemed like ages, everyone was saying how Canon should be upgrading within the next couple of years etc. and now it has finally happened! It seems they are looking after the birders/sports shooters which is good. Be interesting to find out the prices.
    Tim | Capturing God's Creation


    Canon 7D | Tokina 11-16 F/2.8 | Canon 400 F/5.6 | Canon 50 F/1.8 | Manfrotto CF Tripod | Cokin Z GND Filters | Lowepro 400AW | GoPro Hero 2 | Kwik Camo


  8. #28
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Join Date
    08 Nov 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,303
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd expect the prices for the super-teles to be at least equal to their predecessors if not more.

    These are seriously expensive lenses.

  9. #29
    Member twister's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Jul 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Xenedis View Post
    I'd expect the prices for the super-teles to be at least equal to their predecessors if not more.

    These are seriously expensive lenses.
    They are more expensive...by close to 25% looking at the RRPs.

  10. #30
    Serial Truant....
    Join Date
    01 Jun 2008
    Location
    Launceston
    Posts
    592
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd have liked a 14-24 with specs as good as the Nikon 14-24, I don't think it's going to happen though.

  11. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    921
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Pricing (in UK) is very, very high for the new glasses!!

    Mark III extenders - £550 each
    EF8-15/4L fisheye - £1499
    EF70-300/4.5-5.6L IS - £1599 (considerably more than the DO, never mind the current 70-300IS)
    EF300/2.8L IS II - £7499
    EF400/2.8L IS II - £11499

  12. #32
    can't remember Tannin's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Huon Valley
    Posts
    4,131
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JimD View Post
    I don't see the 60D as a HUGE improvement over the 50D at all.
    It isn't meant to be. In fact it isn't meant to be an improvement at all, though it is in some regards. If you want a huge improvement, get a 7D. The old 10D, 20D, 30D, 40D, 50D series has been split into two different models - the more expensive but better 7D, 7D II, 7D III series, and the cheaper but plasticy 60D, 70D, 80D series. (Assuming that they keep the current naming conventions, obviously.)
    Tony

    It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.

  13. #33
    can't remember Tannin's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Huon Valley
    Posts
    4,131
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RaoulIsidro View Post
    Very sad indeed, for the XXD series.
    It peaked at 40D
    Crashed at 50D
    Burned at 60D
    What a way to end a series...
    Huh? The 40D was by far the worst of the entire series. Poor reliability, worst picture quality since the 10D (i.e., inferior to the 20D, 30D, 50D, and doubtless 60D too, though we don't know that last from our own knowledge yet), certainly not a camera to love.

    Mind you, even as the worst of the series, picture quality-wise, it was still pretty good. I still use mine, but only as a last-resort backup. (I had two but sold the other one when I bought the 7D.)

  14. #34
    Member Mircula's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Dec 2009
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    406
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tannin View Post
    Huh? The 40D was by far the worst of the entire series. Poor reliability, worst picture quality since the 10D (i.e., inferior to the 20D, 30D, 50D, and doubtless 60D too, though we don't know that last from our own knowledge yet), certainly not a camera to love.

    Mind you, even as the worst of the series, picture quality-wise, it was still pretty good. I still use mine, but only as a last-resort backup. (I had two but sold the other one when I bought the 7D.)
    Hey ho, I am just about to upgrade from 20d to 40d....Why do you think the iq is sooooo bad with the 40d and what do other people think about that?

    I definitely cannot afford a 7d.....
    Constructive criticism is most welcome!!!

    Canon 40D, 100-300 5.6 L
    Sigma 17-70
    Manfrotto Tripod

  15. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    23 Jun 2010
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    126
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by reaction View Post
    I think your reasoning is wrong, but the result is about right. 50D didn't bring better performance vs 40D.

    Thinking how the 40D brought so many new features vs 30D, and now 40D users have no reason to want the 60D. But they did need something to compete with the D90, they shouldn't have added so much to the 550D line.
    Youre right, 550d is packed with features ... just smaller/lighter camera.
    My 40d works great, fits great im my hands....Yesterday found that 60d is released and thought WOW, it must be good one, but if I was going to upgrade from my 40d would probably get 7d or 5d!!

  16. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    23 Jun 2010
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    126
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tannin View Post
    Huh? The 40D was by far the worst of the entire series. Poor reliability, worst picture quality since the 10D (i.e., inferior to the 20D, 30D, 50D, and doubtless 60D too, though we don't know that last from our own knowledge yet), certainly not a camera to love.

    Mind you, even as the worst of the series, picture quality-wise, it was still pretty good. I still use mine, but only as a last-resort backup. (I had two but sold the other one when I bought the 7D.)
    Have to disagree with your opinion about 40d, have used mine for last 2 years and never complained about picture quality, if photos werent good that meant that I did sth wrong....few of my mates got one too and didnt complain either... even having 20d before.
    Would rather get few better lenses than new body, though would be nice to have 7d or 5d!!

  17. #37
    Ausphotography Veteran
    Join Date
    08 Nov 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,303
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by andylo View Post
    EF70-300/4.5-5.6L IS
    I really don't understand why Canon introduced this.

    It already has two slow 70-300mm zooms in its lineup.

  18. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    29 Nov 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    133
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I currently have a 40D for a year plus now. Was thinking of upgrading to 60D if it's good but looks like it's either 5d or 7d now... sad. That's huge amount of difference.
    Crumpler 5 Million Dollar + Canon EOS 7D + Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM, Manfrotto tripod
    Previous owned gear: Canon EOS 400D, Canon EOS 40D, Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG, Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM, Macro Canon EF 35mm f/2, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8, Tamron 55-250m, Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 USM Macro, EF 85mm f/1.8 USM

  19. #39
    Member
    Join Date
    22 Apr 2010
    Location
    Launceston
    Posts
    358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tannin View Post
    It isn't meant to be. In fact it isn't meant to be an improvement at all, though it is in some regards. If you want a huge improvement, get a 7D. The old 10D, 20D, 30D, 40D, 50D series has been split into two different models - the more expensive but better 7D, 7D II, 7D III series, and the cheaper but plasticy 60D, 70D, 80D series. (Assuming that they keep the current naming conventions, obviously.)
    What is a 7D II and a 7D III - I thought there was just the 7D at the moment ?
    My Goal in life is to be as good a person as my dog thinks I am

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •