User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  1
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 32 of 32

Thread: Walk around Lens

  1. #21
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Trecky's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 May 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by koputai View Post
    My general use lens (walk around..whatever) is the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS. It's a bit dearer than the 15-85mm, but seems to be a much better lens. It has a decent zoom range on a crop body, and the f/2.8 apperture is really useful. It is known for sucking in dust, but that varies from user to user, and Canon say it doesn't affect image quality. I use mine all the time and love it. Of course, it is a large lens compared to the 18-55mm and 15-85mm, but worth the extra grams and dollars IMO.

    Of course, I'm now thinking of getting a 35mm f/2 prime for 'walkaround'.

    Cheers,
    Jason.
    Thanks Jason, yes I was also looking at that one.

    Cheers
    ___________________________________
    LEE

    Canon 500D, Canon 18-55 lens, Canon 70-200 L4 lens.

  2. #22
    Member Bluesun's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I saw from your posts that you like landscapes and find the 70 end too limiting. The new Tamron 18-270 is pretty hard to beat as it allows the wide angle shot for your landscapes or getting up closer with the 270 end. The lens is not really designed for low light so a 35mm or 50mm 1.7 prime is my other option when the light gets dimmer. In daylight the Tamron is hard to beat though.

  3. #23
    Member amandathorson's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Aug 2010
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I own the 24-105mm which is a great lens, I used to use it on a 30D which gave me the same crop as you would get if you put the lens on your 500D...I was fine with it. Yes you do loose your width a bit...but it's still a very versatile lens. It was great to have once I upgraded to my 5D mk II body, I would recommend doing the same thing...it work for me
    Also if you do get the 24-105mm see if you can get one split from the kit....a lot of camera stores have extras that have been split from the 5D. It should save you at least $150 on the lens.

  4. #24
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Trecky's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 May 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluesun View Post
    I saw from your posts that you like landscapes and find the 70 end too limiting. The new Tamron 18-270 is pretty hard to beat as it allows the wide angle shot for your landscapes or getting up closer with the 270 end. The lens is not really designed for low light so a 35mm or 50mm 1.7 prime is my other option when the light gets dimmer. In daylight the Tamron is hard to beat though.


    Quote Originally Posted by amandathorson View Post
    I own the 24-105mm which is a great lens, I used to use it on a 30D which gave me the same crop as you would get if you put the lens on your 500D...I was fine with it. Yes you do loose your width a bit...but it's still a very versatile lens. It was great to have once I upgraded to my 5D mk II body, I would recommend doing the same thing...it work for me
    Also if you do get the 24-105mm see if you can get one split from the kit....a lot of camera stores have extras that have been split from the 5D. It should save you at least $150 on the lens.
    Thanks guys for the help.

  5. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    25 Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My post is different to most. I have found that these days I just take my 5DII and a 50mm f/1.4 and that is it. That way I can just focus on the world around me, and "Point and click" when I see a great photo. I love the simplicity.
    Amateurs care about sharpness
    Professionals care about sales
    Photographers care about light

  6. #26
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Trecky's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 May 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks everyone.

  7. #27
    Member TassieSnapper's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Sep 2006
    Location
    Hobart, Tasmania
    Posts
    106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have one. and I love it. Awesome lens
    Canon 5d MkII
    EF 24-105 f4L IS USM
    EF 100 f2.8 Macro USM
    EF 17-40 f4L USM
    EF 50 f1.8
    Canon 580ex II

  8. #28
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Trecky's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 May 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TassieSnapper View Post
    I have one. and I love it. Awesome lens
    I have decided to get my Macro 100mm L lens first, but after that might have a look at this lens. Seems many people love it.
    Thanks for letting me know. Always good to hear from someone that has this lens.

    Cheers

  9. #29
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    29 Nov 2008
    Location
    River Murray
    Posts
    728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    1.4/50mm lens. it's dirt cheap, and you won't have to crank up the ISO if you shoot in low light.

  10. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    08 Jan 2008
    Location
    Bendigo, Victoria
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It is really about what you are interested as a walk around lens. Personally 50mm is usually more than enough with the following reasons.

    1. A near normal perspective through this lens comfortable to the user.
    2. Training the composition skill with a prime better than a zoom.
    3. A light weight lens to carry around with the ease of carrying.

    It is really about what your purpose of walk around lens is. Tailoring to the need, there is always a lens for your need.

  11. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    07 May 2010
    Location
    Bruthen, East Gippsland
    Posts
    4,638
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    While on the subject. I'm thinking of the AF-S VR 18-110mm lens for myself. I find I use the 55 -200mm kit lens more than the 18 -50mm kit lens, so I need something that is in the middle. I don't do a lot of low light stuff, or macro, but a lot of outside stuff. If there is anything that would be better for around the same price let me know.
    Geoff.
    Geoff
    Honesty is best policy.
    CC is always welcome
    Nikon D3000 ... Nikon D90... Nikon D700 Various lenses, Home studio equipment and all the associated stuff
    Flickr

  12. #32
    Member
    Threadstarter
    Trecky's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 May 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by roentarre View Post
    It is really about what you are interested as a walk around lens. Personally 50mm is usually more than enough with the following reasons.

    1. A near normal perspective through this lens comfortable to the user.
    2. Training the composition skill with a prime better than a zoom.
    3. A light weight lens to carry around with the ease of carrying.

    It is really about what your purpose of walk around lens is. Tailoring to the need, there is always a lens for your need.
    Thank you for the advice. I have heaps to think about.

    Cheers.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •