User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  0
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Looking at getting a ID MkIII

  1. #1
    Ausphotography Regular
    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Looking at getting a ID MkIII

    Missus said I can buy a ID MkIII if I want..... what?!

    After give myself a king hit on the head *OUCH* and realize I am not dreaming... I am looking on ebay etc to get one for myself.

    But having say that, is there anything BAD about the MkIII? OR Is there anything I should have aware?

    On top of that... why should I not look at the 5D/5DMkII?
    Last edited by andylo; 28-07-2010 at 2:57pm. Reason: adding comments on 5D

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,837
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cant focus, but, hey, that might be just hearsay
    Darren
    Gear : Nikon Goodness
    Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
    Please support Precious Hearts
    Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated

  3. #3
    Ausphotography Regular
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Really? I thought the 1D series has the best AF in the entire line. Including both center/non-center focusing.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,837
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    panned by a lot of sports guys I know, couldnt wait to get rid of it for either the D3 or the MkIV

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    28 Aug 2008
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    1,913
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the major problem with it when it first came out was the shutter failing due to the high FPS as well as a mis-timed AF system for the early models

    after a re-call by Canon or servicing from them all fixed and later model 1D3s worked excellently - but its reputation was blighted by those early few months when it came out

    make sure u know the history of the camera and if it has been rectified by Canon or not

  6. #6
    Fuji Fanatic
    Join Date
    20 Mar 2008
    Location
    Glenorchy
    Posts
    4,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mod note: Selling not allowed in this forum
    Last edited by Kym; 28-07-2010 at 4:23pm.
    Odille

    “Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky”

    My Blog | Canon 1DsMkII | 60D | Tokina 20-35mm f/2.8 AF AT-X PRO | EF50mm f/1.8| Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM | Fujifilm X-T1 & X-M1 | Fujinon XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS | Fujinon XC 50-230mm F3.5-5.6 OIS | Fujinon XF 18-55mm F2.8-4R LM OIS | tripods, flashes, filters etc ||

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,837
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The fix wasnt much chop from the people I know mate.

    I think you need to also determine what you want the camera for (crop or ff ?)

    Everything I see suggests full frame, 5DMKII is an excellent cam, not as good at the D700, lol, but, up there

  8. #8
    Ausphotography Regular
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mod Note: Selling not allowed in this forum
    Last edited by Kym; 28-07-2010 at 4:23pm.

  9. #9
    Ausphotography Regular
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    wasn't even trying to, just merely asking for opinion.

    Anyway, how about 1DS MK2 vs 1D MK3?

  10. #10
    Member Hays's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 May 2010
    Location
    Forest Hill
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good on you that your wife gave you permission to buy 1Dmk3.
    Depends on your need and budget both 1Dsmk2 and 1Dmk3 is a good camera.
    Happy hunting and hope that you get one soon

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    19 Aug 2010
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    628
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    there was a problem with 1d mk3 focusing that got fixed, and i think later serial numbers did not have this problem. But i guess the stigma stays.
    I would test the camera if possible, if buying second hand, ask if there are any problems with ai servo.
    Personally i find the AF on the mk3 very satisfying, superior to 7D AF. the 1D bodies are so nice and solid, as well as dual card slot is nice.

  12. #12
    Ausphotography Regular Brian500au's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 May 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,062
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have owned and used the 1DMII, 1DsMII, and the 1DMIII. All are great cameras, with the MKIII just a little more updated in the menu design (and of course the 14bit processor, bigger LCD screen, and faster shutter action). You can pick up the 1DMKII for under a $1000 now, with the 1DsMKII and the 1DMKIII for between $2000 and $2500. Both the MKII share the same menu button and menu system.

    The problem with the MKIII focus system only happened in the A1 servo mode and canon did do a fix for this. This is a case of the loudest axle gets the most grease. Very few people experienced the problem (and very few people would have had the use, or the experience to replicate the problem) but it certainly did give the MKIII a tarnished reputation. You will find thousands of threads with this problem over the net, but in reality any MKIII you pick up today would have had the fix already applied. Even if you did pick up a body that had not had the fix you will still be unlucky to have the circumstances correct to replicate the problem.

    In my opinion any of the three above mentioned bodies are great bodies.
    www.kjbphotography.com.au

    1Dx, 5DsR, 200-400 f4L Ext, 100-400 f4.5-5.6L II, 70-300 f4-5.6L IS, 70-200 f2.8L IS II, 24-70 f2.8L II, 16-35 f4 IS, 11-24 f4L, 85 f1.2L II, 500 f4L IS, 300 f2.8 IS, ∑50 f1.4 A


  13. #13
    can't remember
    Join Date
    16 Apr 2007
    Location
    Ballarat
    Posts
    2,010
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The 1D III is a wonderful all-round camera, vastly superior to any of the semi-pro models in its handling, response, and flexibility. The AF is phenomenally good. Back before the fix, some copies used to have bad hair days. To a certain extent, they still do, BUT it is very rare, it only happens under particular conditions, and it isn't too dificult to avoid if you keep your wits about you.

    In return, you get camera that has unmatched handling and responsiveness, and truly superb colour reproduction. Yes, 1D III images really do have a special richness, an almost tactile quality to them that no other camera (that I know of) quite matches. The superb old 20D had a little of this, but far stronger in the 1D III. This isn't just me dreaming stiff up, I have seen the exact same observation made in print by Rob Galbraith himself - the gentleman who brought the whole AF question into the light with his careful, scientific testing.

    I have retired my 1D III now from duty as my primary birding camera on the 500/4. Despite not matching the old Mark III in many ways, the 7D has superior resolution and can have superior focus depending on the particular circumstances of the shot. For bird work, the 7D is a better camera, all things considered.

    However, my 1D III is now enjoying a whole new second career as a landscape camera, matched to the 100-400, and I'm discovering all over again what a delight it is to use. It might be only 10MP, but by George, every little one of those 10 million dots works overtime to produce the goods. Quality matters.

    At about 6 grand new, they were too damn dear. But if you can get one for a decent price, go for it.
    Tony

    Edit and critique at will. Tokina 10-17 fish, Canon 10-22, 24-105, 100-400, TS-E 24, 35/1.4, 60 macro, 100L macro, 500/4, Wimberley, MT-24EX, 580EX-II, 1D IV, 7D, 5D II, 50D.

  14. #14
    Ausphotography Regular
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sigh... I have been looking for one very hard. I had a chance on ebay but have been pre-occupied by family duties and unable to make a effective bid

    Personally I found most of the 1D were workhorses. Been "abused professionally" is how I describe them.

    Hopefully will find one soon. Otherwise I might turn to the dark side and get a D3 instead

  15. #15
    Ausphotography Regular
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Finally finally finally... I got myself a 1DMk III

    OMG this thing is so demanding and so difficult to use! But I am amaze how well the image turns out (if input all the parameters correctly)

    I went out for some night cityscape photos and about to upload for the C&C

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    02 Sep 2010
    Location
    near Toowoomba
    Posts
    344
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    good on ya Andy

    I have been hoping for a 5D, but maybe a secoundhand 1D is the way to go...

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    09 Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane - Bayside
    Posts
    3,416
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Glad to hear you are happy with your choice.
    Thanks for looking....Cheers,
    Julie-Anne / Julie / Jules / Julesy / JAS

    MY ..... MY BLOG..... Feel free to look.
    Canon 40D / 24-105mm L IS / 70-200mm L IS / 75-300mm / 50mm 1.8 / Sigma 10-20mm / Manfrotto tripod / Bits and pieces to fill the bag.


  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    29 Jun 2006
    Location
    North Shore
    Posts
    228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They are one of the first cameras that I would consider selling both of mine for. Still hesitant with the 1.3 crop as it changes my wide. Still considering, but if you decide not to go with it, makes bidding for me easier. I also think the 1ds mk2 is a brilliant option.
    Using a 7d or a s95
    Advice and Edits welcome
    http://adamrose.wordpress.com/ [/CENTER]

  19. #19
    Ausphotography Regular
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    06 Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    923
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, you are right about the 1.3x. But coming from a 500D (and have tried to use a 1Ds MkIII just over the weekend) the difference between 1.6x vs 1.3x visually is much bigger than 1.3x and FF.

    My 1DMkIII works billirant so far (only the idiot on the back of the camera creating problem) so I don't see I will be off loading mine anytime soon.

    On the other hand, I will look into either a 5D or 1Ds MkIII just for the sake of FF sensor.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •