User Tag List

Thanks useful information Thanks useful information:  3
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39

Thread: Teleconverters

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Kenko 1.4 Pro DG works great on the 70-200, I have that combo

    Not much point showing pics here as the iq on a posted photo will not show you anything
    Darren
    Gear : Nikon Goodness
    Website : http://www.peakactionimages.com
    Please support Precious Hearts
    Constructive Critique of my images always appreciated

  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    14 Jun 2010
    Location
    Brunswick
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    @kiwi, thanks and I agree. I've also read lots of good reviews with the 1.4x but i think the the extra range it gives is too small. I'm actually leaning towards a 1.7x or 2x.
    Nikon User
    Nikon D300
    Walk-around lens:Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 AF-S G VR1; Nikkor 24-70 f/2.8 AF-S G
    Macro (the lazy type): Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 (kitlens); reverse ring adaptor
    Strobing: SB900; Flashwave trigger III, generic gorilla pod

    FLICKR http://www.flickr.com/photos/joeyvaldezjr/

  3. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    what are you going to use it for (in general) ?

    Adding 40% is quite a lot really (a 1.4 TC) esp if you have a crop camera as well

  4. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    14 Jun 2010
    Location
    Brunswick
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    planning to use it's birds. And by the way, it is possible to shoot macro-like shots with a tc?

  5. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2009
    Location
    Northern Beaches, Sydney
    Posts
    2,338
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Irrespective of whether you can tell and mainly because I love posting this shot (D90 + Kenko Pro 300 DG + 70-200 2.8 VRII at f4):


  6. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by joeyvaldezjr View Post
    planning to use it's birds. And by the way, it is possible to shoot macro-like shots with a tc?
    If you want birds you want maximum length

    I think the 2x TC is the go

    No, will not really help with macros.

    Kenko Extension tubes will though.

  7. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2009
    Location
    Northern Beaches, Sydney
    Posts
    2,338
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wouldn't extension tubes and a TC for the purposes of macro kind of have opposite effects? i.e. tubes would allow you a closer focussing distance (and thus increase magnification) while a TC would allow you a greater focussing distance whilst retaining the same magnification? If that even makes sense?

    I'll have to give it a go with the TC and see what happens.

  8. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All a TC does is change the effective focal length and minimum apperture - Ill have to think about whether it effects the minimum focus distance ? hmmmmm ?

    The extension tubes allow you to focus closer, they do not magnify the image per se

    In combination they would work too...hmmmm....depending on the answer to point #1

  9. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2009
    Location
    Northern Beaches, Sydney
    Posts
    2,338
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kiwi View Post
    The extension tubes allow you to focus closer, they do not magnify the image per se
    It wasn't so much the focusing distances that I was getting at, it was more the effect.

    With tubes you can get a larger image onto your sensor by moving in closer (?)

    Leaving aside the issue of focusing distance with the TC am I right in (assuming) that from the same physical distance (i.e. between tog and subject) you would get a larger image size on your sensor, and then by extension, you can stand further away from your subject whilst getting the same image size on your sensor than without the TC?

    Basically was just wondering whether I should bother with trying the TC on the macro lens - the one time that I thought it might come in useful is having the ability to not have to get so close to a dangerous subject like a wasp or spider, yet get an equivalent image size than without the TC.

  10. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, Ive seen it used that way for that reason

  11. #31
    Member Mircula's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Dec 2009
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    406
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All teleconverters degrade image quality somewhat... as well as dropping your aperture. Given that in most circumstances you'll get as good results simply by cropping a wider image.
    So why does the TC degrade IQ and does it depend on the lens how much it degrades it?
    How come it has an affect on the aperture as well and is that lens dependent?

    Would it be possible to mount a TC on a normal zoom lens as the 28-105 for instance?

    Cheers,

    Mirc
    Constructive criticism is most welcome!!!

    Canon 40D, 100-300 5.6 L
    Sigma 17-70
    Manfrotto Tripod

  12. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Feb 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    7,830
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So why does the TC degrade IQ and does it depend on the lens how much it degrades it?

    >> because you are putting an additional few layers of glass between the lens and camera, so, like any filter, some degradation depending on the optical quality of the glass and TC is inevitable. The only question is by how much.

    How come it has an affect on the aperture as well and is that lens dependent?

    >> Because each layer of glass takes light...it's not lens dependent is TC dependent, eg 1.4 TC takes one stop, 2x TX takes two stops etc

    Would it be possible to mount a TC on a normal zoom lens as the 28-105 for instance?

    >> Sometimes - refer to chart as above although unless your lens is f/4 or faster typically dont bother

  13. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    12 Nov 2009
    Location
    Monterey Bay, California
    Posts
    172
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kiwi View Post
    right, not familiar with a 1.5TC

    There is a Nikon chart that shows all the compatibility

    http://blog.nikonians.org/archives/N...er%20Table.pdf
    Kenko has just discontinued both versions 1.5x teleconverters.
    If you can find one (not SHQ), the good one the MC DG has more than doubled in price.

  14. #34
    Member R1titan's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Jan 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    702
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by maccaroneski View Post
    Wouldn't extension tubes and a TC for the purposes of macro kind of have opposite effects? i.e. tubes would allow you a closer focussing distance (and thus increase magnification) while a TC would allow you a greater focussing distance whilst retaining the same magnification? If that even makes sense?

    I'll have to give it a go with the TC and see what happens.
    Adding a TC will increase the replication ratio by the equivalent amount, 2x TC = 2x magnification, the mfd will not change.


    Quote Originally Posted by Mircula View Post
    Would it be possible to mount a TC on a normal zoom lens as the 28-105 for instance?

    Cheers,
    Mirc
    Depends on which TC you use. The Canon ones will not work on such a lens, they are only compatible with Canon primes in excess of 135mm, or zooms from 70-200mm on. It will mount but you will lose the ability to AF and read aperture.

    For the 28-105 lens, Kenko Pro DG TCs will work and report aperture, however that lens is not optimised for speed and the resulting aperture may be too slow for your given body to AF.
    Canon User

  15. #35
    A. P's Culinary Indiscriminant
    Join Date
    21 Mar 2009
    Location
    Cronulla, Sydney
    Posts
    8,935
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Joey,
    Look in “Nikon” and in “lenses” on this forum and see Sar Nop’s thread dealing with 600mm lens plus many different converters (including Kenko and Nikon) and also his thread on 70-200VR with 20EIII converter
    Nikon and Pentax user



  16. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    14 Jun 2010
    Location
    Brunswick
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks mongo! I'll try and search for that

  17. #37
    Member
    Threadstarter

    Join Date
    05 Jun 2010
    Location
    Country
    Posts
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    WOW, disappear to buy a nice Nikkor lens and come back to find some real handy replies to my question...excellent and thanks. Sure looks like the TC 20III could be worth pursuing for my new 70-200.

    Was informed by a couple of salespeople that Kenko won't work with the Nikkor lens but not entirely sure there wasn't some confusion with terminology around extension tubes and teleconverters.

    Think the TC 20 III will be added to the wish-list.

  18. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    24 Jun 2009
    Location
    Northern Beaches, Sydney
    Posts
    2,338
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BUGSnBIRDS View Post

    Was informed by a couple of salespeople that Kenko won't work with the Nikkor lens but not entirely sure there wasn't some confusion with terminology around extension tubes and teleconverters.

    Think the TC 20 III will be added to the wish-list.
    No problem at all with my Kenko and 70-200. At $189, i thought I would pick it up and keep the TC20III on the wishlist too

  19. #39
    Shore Crawler Dylan & Marianne's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Mar 2009
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    9,333
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just got my 2X canon one this week - going to test it out on long landscapes tripod mounted today on some waterfalls. will let you know how it goes
    Call me Dylan! www.everlookphotography.com | www.everlookphotography.wordpress.com | www.flickr.com/photos/dmtoh
    Canon EOS R5, : 16-35mm F4 L, 70-200F4 canon L, 24-70mm 2.8IIcanon L, Sirui tripod + K20D ballhead + RRS ballhead. |Sony A7r2 + Laowa 12mm F2.8, Nisi 15mm F4
    Various NiSi systems : Currently using switch filter and predominantly 6 stop ND, 10 stop ND, 3 stop medium GND
    Post : Adobe lightroom classic CC : Photoshop CC. Various actions for processing and web export

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •